data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8e99/b8e99c54baa06a9c329a63714705b05a5ea90943" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfd2a/cfd2a1dbdaa2a4665edc5da6ca698927da8c09c6" alt=""
Came here to post the interview. Good stuff. Incriminating stuff.
Came here to post the interview. Good stuff. Incriminating stuff.
I’m not on ca. I’m on world. But I can see how I might have been first because I had just hit the scales sort and it was the first post I saw. It’s possible that I was in before anyone else on the instance.
It was a big zero. Nothing but the group description.
I’m also on boost. I didn’t go back because it was completely empty.
Isn’t he already withholding aid?
Jeep running pop-up ads every time you stop. https://m.slashdot.org/story/438631
I’m with you on this. If Google didn’t change it then they were risking lawsuits. Big difference between milking customers for more with less vs caving to avoid lose.
Found a brand new one.
The problem with that is the list becomes outdated as more and more companies embrace the process. Specific examples are what we need.
The responses so far are not specific examples of individual companies, brands features etc. They suffer the same problem as the article. Please be specific. For example when you say subscriptions on cars maybe mention BMW trying to put a subscription on heated seats.
The list isn’t useful if it’s not specific.
Are we the bad guys?
Each day on Lemmy I scroll and scroll and then I reach a headline where after reading it I have to parse what it says. And then I realize it’s gibberish. And then I realize it’s the bottom of the feed and what I’m reading has a negative score.
Today this was that post.
I have bad news for you about babies. And many people make sure to fully evacuate before a flight because they will do anything to avoid that bathroom.