I really need to figure out a better sandboxing method for shells. It’s crazy to be things where my keys, browser data, shell history are all accessible.
I do try to use firejail where possible, but it’s quite cumbersome. Every so often I look for tools to help with this, but everything is oriented around making a specific program (e.g. Firefox, steam) work.
A world cup with 48 teams, where fucking Curacao qualified. If you get invited because the president of the host country started a war with one of the participants, you cannot accept. That is shame you will never recover from.
Yeah, I’d say for information, certainly, but there are other ways you could be valuable. A dev on a popular open source project might be very valuable for executing supply chain attacks.
First of all, fuck them.
Secondly, thank you for working on this app. I know Roku is a bit of a liability, and I’ll eventually have to move to something open source, but it’s been my main media player for a couple of years and I’ve been very happy with it. o7
Sounds like he got to visit a pedo-island.
The problem with the phone thing is that banks (though not all of them) limit you to two operating system vendors: Google and Apple. Is that better than Visa and MC?
You can audit the code but something like:
The rate of commits and new features seems rather high for a single person working by themselves
Is a huge problem in itself IMO. It implies there’s no real human oversight of the project.
That’s the scary thing. It can easily create more code than it can understand, and do it faster than human understanding can keep up with.
Furthermore, a peer review process is planned, through which the consortium members will mutually check and certify their operating systems and smartphone or tablet models. “This is intended to create transparency and replace trust with traceability.”
Still doesn’t sound very open.
I should be able to tell my bank to only trust devices running an OS signed by the grapheneos key, and more importantly I should be able to tell them to trust an OS signed by my key.
Edit: I don’t mean to shit on this too hard. It might be the best next step.
I wonder if fucking over the working class is actually bad for productivity…
TODAY WE WILL HIT THEM WITH A FORCE THAT THEY HAVE NEVER EXPERIENCED BEFORE.
Shame? Empathy?
It’s called a Doohickey, thank you very much
I assume it’s https://maps.app.goo.gl/AJueGfuadF4Xy195A
It’s a consulate for a medium-sized country in a medium-sized city, so it might just be one person at a desk.
Why did you post a bunch of asterixes?
I just finished Normal People, which was my first Sally Rooney book. I loved it, but I wouldn’t say it had a lot of political theory, just light commentary by the characters. I take it you recommend Beautiful World?
I’m currently reading The Bricks That Built the Houses by Kae Tempest. It might be a good candidate, but I’m not far enough through to really recommend it yet.
Some that come to mind:
In a particularly retro touch, the new ID Polo will even have a volume dial.
This seems like a weird thing to mention because every stupid touchscreen car I’ve driven still has a volume dial.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_Safety_Amendment#Platforms_affected https://www.esafety.gov.au/about-us/industry-regulation/social-media-age-restrictions/which-platforms-are-age-restricted
eSafety does not have a formal role in declaring which services are age-restricted social media platforms. In the absence of any rules made by the Minister of Communications specifying a service is either an age-restricted social media platform or not an age-restricted social media platform, any determination that a service is or is not an age-restricted social media platform is a matter for the court.
Services which do not currently meet the definition of ‘age-restricted social media platform’ should routinely self-assess, including when introducing a new social feature or function or when observing changes in the ways existing and new account holders are using their service.
So technically they need to self-assess based on the legislation, but based on the published lists I really doubt they have anything to worry about.
Doesn’t fdroid build everything from source (in the main repo)? There’s no way Google would allow them to do that with their own developer keys.
The part I don’t understand is how there are enough people betting on the temperature being normal on one specific day at CDG, that you can make that much money betting on it being hot.