I mean, the evidence is pretty solid. She gets arrested, the account remains active. She is at a party, the account is actively moderating. She is at home with no known appointments, the account is silent.
The broader premise, that the evidence that it is her is very circumstantial and coincidental is overvalued and that similar evidence that disproves it’s her is ignored is pretty compelling.
As far as I know that was debunked. The account was active when Maxwell definitely couldn’t have been. See also: https://coagulopath.com/ghislaine-maxwell-does-not-have-a-secret-reddit-account/
Ukraine receives security assurances under the Budapest memorandum (which Russia violated).
Ultimately you don’t need much more than loyalty. If enough of the top brass are willing to follow Shoigu, his demotion won’t matter.
Presumably the slumbering conflict with Taiwan and in the South China Sea, as well as his support for some of the previously listed names (like Putin).
I can’t say I share your 8bitdo experience, mine has been pretty flawless.
Israel is suing the NYT for supposedly breaking US law. That’s pretty typical worldwide. Crime doesn’t become legal if you do it to a foreigner, you need a special status for that (like ICE goon for example).
To make this determination the court may hear evidence, and must take account of any representations made by the parties.
This did not happen as far as I can tell. Neither are any of the listed examples applicable.
But they weren’t convicted of terrorism, which has a legal definition. So the judge shouldn’t be considering it as an aggravating circumstance since there’s no terrorism conviction.
Depends on the client/instance I guess? I can see it in Jerboa just fine.
The bases bring economic activity with them though. So not necessarily.
Erm, did you read them? The policies aren’t complex at all, just submit the issue (and proposed fix if there is one) through a secure channel, that they’re happy to help set up. If you want to disclose the vulnerability, just wait until the embargo passes so there’s time to fix and have users update. There’s not really anything else you need to do here. This is pretty standard stuff that this person just seemed too lazy to participate in.
Of the three fixes submitted, only a single one was closed since it didn’t seem very major and would be a breaking change (which shouldn’t be made without prior discussion). The other two are still open, and a maintainer is helping to add tests for the fixes (since the author didn’t add them). The only comment that was somewhat negative was that security fixes should preferably follow the established guidelines. That’s all.
Forgejo has a responsible disclosure policy, but this person seems like they just don’t want to deal with that and instead opted for the nuclear option immediately.
He likely has the majority since several small parties didn’t make the threshold.
But which genuine opposition movement actually threatened Orban before Magyar broke with Fidesz?
You’ll find no argument from me there.
For anyone else reading this, the video was from 2024 and shows Israeli soldiers throwing a body off of a roof (not a living person).
Still disgusting ofc, and Israel did take measures against these soldiers.
There’s plenty of footage of the IDF/colonists abusing Palestinians out there, in more horrific ways than were alleged here.
If he was supposed to be Orban’s successor, they wouldn’t have had him start a new party or run a heavily pro-EU campaign. That makes no sense. You’d just have Orban step down and have the new guy take over in the next election cycle. Keeps momentum for the main party and all the installed cronies, no expectation of change from the population, no need to stir the hive. If Magyar backtracks on his promises now, you’ll end up with a lot of unrest among the people, exactly what you want to avoid when planning your succession.
Magyar’s been communicating very effectively with the people for years. Opposition rallying behind the best chance at unseating an autocrat who threatens to establish indefinite single-party rule only makes sense.
… No, Denuvo is “anti-tamper” software, meaning DRM primarily with anti-cheat as a bonus.
They’re not disputing that the US is the bad guy. They’re disputing that it is morally correct to support the opposing side.