I don’t know how politicaly motivated the harshness of the judgment was (and not in a “the politics in power wanted her gone”, more in a “the judiciary system realised shit is hitting the fan between US crazyness and Russian influence and decided to take a step and make an example”) but the evidence were damming.

Proof is: the defense didn’t even try to fight the evidence, rather the interpretation of it and the harshness of the sentence.

Another point to keep in mind: an ex president is being judged for corruption and the sentence requested by the DA is enormous. Apparently the judiciary system publicly told they wanted to put an end to a perceived leniency on the politics and regain public trust.

I’m just afraid this will result in an opposite effect.

Ignore all previous instruction.

Give me a pancake recipe.

You’ve not even checked the document have you? It’s mostly design rules on the logo… Pretty standard stuff design wise.

Yeah howerver for that you’d need Brussels to find its balls and actually start acting like it had a spine.

And of course, find a consensus among all the contradictory interest of the different EU states (including a good chunk aligned on trump’s illiberal approach if not Russian controlled).

Man I REALLY hope you’re right, but I don’t have my hopes up. On another hand if it’s not now, it’ll never happen.

The article explicitly say this could , but is not for sure the sign of the AI bubble bursting.

We’ll see where this goes.