Lol, I already did, indeed I made sure to repeat it several times, knowing that you would try to feign amnesia. But of course, you already know that - or you wouldn’t have been trying to desperately pivot to “well who even cares about the numbers!” - and are still just being disingenuous on purpose, as people doing Nazi apologia usually do.
See? You still can’t around the fact that my criticism of what you and your source are doing - using inconsistent methods to make it appear like the data says what you want it to - so know you’re just throwing out random deflections and bad faith non-sequitors.
Who cares about specific numbers
You, dog. You were the one who thought it was such a big deal to be able to say that Nazis killed fewer people than communists that you went to great length to find and manipulate statistics to falsely suggest it. You were the one who made that claim in the first place. It’s much too late for you to try to pretend you don’t care now.
By “wouldn’t take my source in good faith” you of course mean “wouldn’t unquestioningly accept it without reading it”. You’ll notice that my criticism of what you and your source are doing - deliberately using different metrics to give the data the appearance that it says what you want it to - is completely true and you can’t dispute it, so instead you’re just going to arbitrarily declare that it’s “bad faith” and “tankie” to make completely true criticisms of your deliberate dishonesty
And again, you are doing this as a way to downplay the evil of the Nazis, aka Nazi apologia.
So you were well aware that your “source” didn’t hold up even before you posted it.
Though it’s unsurprising that a Nazi apologist would be deliberately disingenuous
Ah, so you’re very sneakily using inconsistent metrics to downplay the Nazis, counting every death that resulted from the policy of communists, but only counting direct and deliberate killings by Nazi Germany.
In other words, you are doing deliberate Nazi apologism.
You’re apparently fine with non-communist authoritarianism then, given that capitalism requires the authoritarian enclosure of the Earth’s common and the forcible restriction of human movement into centrally controlled “nation states”.
You should worry more about the content of what people say, not the form.
Tankies have killed as many people as the Nazis, actually more. Much more deaths attributed to tankies than racists could ever dream to commit.
I too love to make unsourced claims that minimize the evil of the Nazis.
Yeah, racists would never harass or threaten people…
There aren’t Lemmy groups where left, right, OR center can do that
Hmm, interesting, that is indeed quite a mystery.
Wood in my mouth; I struggle with popsicle sticks and chopsticks as a result.
Do other cafinated drinks have the same effect?
It’s the same tedious thought terminating cliches that western chauvinists are pre-progammed to repeat. Many of them are misinformation, (like the “Uyghur genocide” narrative), but most of them don’t even have enough substance to even get to that level.
So you spouted the standard route “China bad” takes.
Ok, but that doesn’t answer my question. How do you determine that something is Russian propaganda specifically?
Good you just answer the question please
Yeah, that’s what I mean. Currently the democrats don’t seem very interested in actually taking action at all to address their situation, but if they actually tried to do something, how could it not just be McCarthiest purges of “Russian assets”, government censorship of “Russian propaganda” and belligerent militarism. Essentially it seems like the Democrats have rendered themselves ideologically incapable of meaningfully opposing the fascist slide.
Kill everyone now, legalise first degree murder, advocate cannibalism, eat shit!