No, you are right. I want Europe to have a resilient grid. I assume Germany would even pay for most of the costs of the transmission infrastructure, given that they consume a lot. I think in a mixture of storage and grid expansion, optimising for grid stability is important. Sweden might want to have a plan for dark, dry, coldrums as well.

What if Sweden built transmission between its north and south? Then it wouldn’t have to point fingers against a party the Swedish ruling party doesn’t like.

Edit: Yeah, there might be truth to the pricing scheme, but pointing at nuclear power phaseout is not ok.