42firehawk

Unless something is fucked with my instance (and my alt that I checked to make sure on Lemmy.zip) I don’t see 4 distinct criteria? Your initial comment was “fuck religion” with no criterion. The comment this chain is off of asks if the Episcopal church makes supernatural claims that go against facts and reality, which is one claim that was responded to.

I can’t find the other 3 criteria unless there’s some form of pedantics I’m not catching.

In terms of the one claim that was addressed with a simple “episcopals follow science” is an adequate answer in my eyes from alders razor. You claimed without any evidence that the church doesn’t believe in fact, then OP responded saying that members of the church tend to follow science and that spirituality on its own isn’t wrong as anecdotal evidence. Its basically nuh uh because no further evidence is needed to refute no evidence, similar to saying no if you claimed democrats ate babies.

At least from my instance this is the only direct claim you’ve made?