Summary

Proposed amendments to Iraq’s Personal Status Law could allow girls as young as 9 to marry, sparking outrage from rights groups and survivors like “Batta,” who endured abuse after being forced into marriage at 11.

The changes would shift decision-making power to clerics, undermining existing protections for women and children established in 1959.

Supporters claim the amendments promote family values, but critics call them a violation of children’s rights and a step toward legalized child abuse.

Activists and lawmakers are working to block the controversial proposal.

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I don’t know why you have to be so hostile over a genuine question.

    • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      What hostility? Don’t “just ask questions” if you’re not man enough for the answer.

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        What hostility?

        JAQing off about a dictator

        perpetual apologists for whatever fascists they can find to drool over

        Yeah, what hostility? 🙄

        Then you add in some dumb shit about being “man enough” without a shred of self-awareness. Are you trolling or are you genuinely like this? Note that PugJesus has yet to show where I was “just asking questions” ever, but don’t let that get in the way of your cheerleading for his baseless accusations.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Because you have a pattern of ‘just asking questions’ on every fascist cunt who comes up? I apologize for having a basic sense of pattern recognition.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Oh, is this going to be like the last time you played dumb as to your past statements, and then when I brought receipts you went silent on the topic and proceeded to waste my fucking time? If it is, I’d at least like to know beforehand.

          • hark@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            You certainly have a wild imagination because if you’re referring to the time I think you are, the last time you brought “receipts” it was you linking to posts of mine not containing anything you claimed I wrote. I don’t know why you’re so angry at me, but perhaps you would be better able to read my posts and not hallucinate patterns if you weren’t in a blind rage.

            It really is unfortunate because I appreciate the information you gave in your initial response, but the hostility was so off-putting.

            • PugJesus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              You certainly have a wild imagination because if you’re referring to the time I think you are, the last time you brought “receipts” it was you linking to posts of mine not containing anything you claimed I wrote.

              Fucking lol

              Maybe stop cheerleading atrocities and fascists if you can’t even keep track of how often you fucking do it.

              It really is unfortunate because I appreciate the information you gave in your initial response, but the hostility was so off-putting.

              Oh, I’m sorry that I was rude to you when all you were doing was trying to play your usual “Amerikkka Bad” card by whitewashing a dictator who tortured and murdered on a literally genocidal scale. You know, not unlike what you do with Assad? Would you like to play apologist for the Taliban next? I know you’re just drooling over the possibility.