Summary

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy asserted that no world leader has the right to negotiate with Russian President Vladimir Putin on behalf of Ukraine.

Speaking to Le Parisien readers, Zelenskyy emphasized that Ukraine alone determines its future and any dialogue with Russia must follow a peace plan based on strength and international support.

He warned against negotiating without clear guarantees of security, highlighting the risks of Putin resuming aggression after a ceasefire.

Zelenskyy called for a strategy ensuring Ukraine’s long-term stability and security, beyond NATO or EU membership timelines.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Tbh a lot of people in the states are under the impression that we CAN do precisely that, because we absolutely have done in the past. But this is also kind of a whole different ballgame, in a ton of pretty crucial ways.

      • ZK686@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Not only that, but we’re giving fucking BILLIONS of money to Ukraine, we SHOULD have a say so in what happens…

        • A Wild Mimic appears!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          you are just funneling BILLIONS into your Military Industrial Complex, which is good for the shareholder value of the usual suspects, while dropping off your used stuff all over Europe. The US are mainly helping themselves. It just happens to also help Ukraine.

          • ZK686@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            The US has to funnel BILLIONS into our own military complex because A: Every single other country on Earth depends on us. B: Lots of countries don’t like us.

            But let me guess, you most likely live here in the US and are just enjoying the high life, while also criticizing how much you hate everything about it.

    • ZK686@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yet, he expects the US to just keep cutting those checks, right?

      • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        You probably even think it’s one of those overisized checks that are often shown in your TV shows, don’t you.

        • ZK686@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          No, but I love how some of you think “We only want the US to be the World Police when it’s convienant for SOME, but not others…”

          • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            What the fuck is that logic even… Do you think you should be sending equal support to russia? You probably do, given your takes…

            • ZK686@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              Dude, when we help Israel, all of a sudden, America’s bad… but, helping Ukraine is good because it’s “stopping that evil empire Russia!” What about the evil empire of Muslim terrorists? If Israel falls, it’s only a matter of time before their surrounding Muslim countries start trying to expand even more.

                • ZK686@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Spotted the liberal. “if I disagree with you, than YOU must be the stupid one!” lol…

  • tired_n_bored@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I am so sad by how Ukraine has been handled.

    The West should have been an overwhelming power against Russian imperialism. Ukraine should have been given everything from the beginning, no strings attached, with no self-imposed red lines.

    They will swallow another democracy in 10-20 years and the cycle repeats.

    • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ah yes “muh Russian Imperialism” argument/excuse that we all heard a bajillion times

      • iskela45@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        What exactly do you describe Russia’s actions in Ukraine then if not imperialism? Do you believe Ukrainians have a right to self determination?

        • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          They lost the right when they Allowed a coup govt to take control & bow down to US interests & harbour Nazis

            • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Suuuure cuz you said so, you’re also gonna deny the killing of ethnic Russians & Shelling in Donbas ? No Not even the fact that there was an agreement that NATO shouldn’t expand borders ?

              No ? None at all ? Ok fine

              • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                That is literally a bullshit copypaste psyop that Russia regurgitated for over a decade to drum up a false narrative.

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Where_have_you_been_for_eight_years%3F

                Unless you’re just a Russian who’s obligated to regurgitate your Nazi state Rhetoric, I’d suggest you educate yourself a little bit on the history of what caused this conflict, the sooner you realize that Russia has been waging probably the largest information war in history in the years leading up to this war.

                **Understand one fundemental thing. Russia is a country that is mentally stuck in the 1700s and is obsessed over big lines on maps, speheres of influence, Emprie. It wants these things, It cant have these things without blood. It wont abandon its pursuit of these things. Russia wants America and NATO out of the picture so it can pick on who it wants. Russia has absolutely no chance of defeating NATO in a military conflict. So their only hope in a confrontation is to have the other side tear itself apart internally, everything they’ve done online the past 15 to 20 years has been in pursuit of that end goal. **

                the sooner you realize that, you’ll stop making a fool of yourself, doing their work for them by posting the same garbage that they cooked up in a military internet troll farm to aid their tinpot worldview goals. And if you dont, well, dont bother replying with more of your crap to me, because I Have an acute sense for Russian Nazi / Kremlin propaganda. You’re wasting your time.

                • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  Even BBC confirmed it, all you’ve done is yell that it’s propaganda, sorry but nope, That doesn’t cut it anymore

                  & cut it out with the “troll” accusations, your side is the one spitting propaganda, people like you also said that Ukraine will bleed Russia dry, now the cat’s out of the bag You’re NAFO imperialists & not in any high positions of morality

    • caboose2006@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Maybe no civilian targets. But other than that totally agree. We should have put lend lease circa 1940s to shame

        • caboose2006@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Or maybe the US should have stopped Catherine the great from annexing Crimea. Jesus you people.

          • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Oh, right, I didn’t remember I wasn’t allowed to set the time frame. Only you have that power, right? 🤦‍♂️

            Edit: and it was YOU the one talking about 1940s.

  • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Bro really just out there like “yo gimme 100 billion dollars to save my country but don’t you dare think you get to speak for me” SMH

    • Tgo_up@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      You realize we’re helping Ukraine because it’s in our own best interest right?

      People are acting like we do it out of our good hearted nature.

      Also, we don’t get to speak for Ukraine just because we’re helping them. I’m tempted to say obviously but apparently it’s not that obvious.

      What the US has a right to do is stop it’s support.

      • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I have no doubts about that, the US has historically been pretty darn good about protecting their own interests.

        The real question is whether it’s also in the Ukraine’s best interest.

    • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      America can tell Russia Ukraine formally surrenders, and that the moon is made of cheese, it isnt going to stop anyone from fighting to protect themselves.

      The fact that even western countries seem to think that there can be negotiations about the fate of Ukraine and its people, without the Ukrainian voice present, is laughable and directley supports Putin and the Russian Mafia’s fantasy-narrative.

        • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Western europe has no choice now, they have to arm up and possibly prepare for war with Russia, or resign, and accept Russian Dominion.

          The US will do as it wills, they’re going to backslide into fighting with themselves, and evidently with Canada and Mexico at this current rate. Europe will have to take the torch, if for no other reason than that they have no choice. Russia and NATO have been de-facto at war with each other for a while.

          I’ve even said that WW3 started years ago but people generally dont agree because they only associate the term WW3, with nuclear exchanges.

          theres’ no turning back from this state though. the last chance we had at an “offramp” was in september 6 to 21 of 2022. at that point, the russian army had suffered a major defeat and been pushed out of over half the territory they had conquered. That was Putin and Kremlin’s opportunity to back off before this spiraled totally beyond control, instead, that door was slammed shut forever on the 21st when Russia announced a mobilization.

          Now, its not going to stop until either Ukraine signs over part of its territory in exchange for NATO protection, Or the fight goes on until a government collapses. (either way just means more war, east or west) No ceasefire outside of of that deal I mentioned, will actually last, or truthfully stop the hostilities. Russian treaties are just an alternate spelling of Toilet paper

  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The right? Maybe not. The ability though? Certainly. Specifically the US absolutely has the power to negotiate an end to the war with Putin.

    • legion02@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      They could negotiate Russia’s end to the war using their own resources (ie. Mostly the embargos) but anything Ukraine forfeits would have to be negotiated by them. The US can’t just cede another nation’s land.

      • small44@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Unfortunately the US definitely can since it gave a lot of military aid to Ukraine. It can force Ukraine to cede land

  • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    You’d think this would be a fairly cut and dry issue - the countries helping Ukraine wouldn’t like it either if another country started negotiating terms on their behalf (especially not with a monster like Putin).

    Ukraine and its people should be the ones to decide their own fate.

    I swear people who think otherwise must’ve read David vs. Goliath and sided with the Goliath.

      • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Israel gets all the munitions it wants to enact a genocide, but Ukraine has to fight for every bullet to fight for its own sovereignty against a modern day dictator. The US government’s priorities really are something.

    • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      must’ve read David vs. Goliath and sided with the Goliath.

      Bold of you to assume that they can read, or that they have read the Bible.

      In my experience not even “devout Christians” do that last one.

        • doctordevice@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          100%. Reading the Bible cover to cover + learning about the history of how Judaism was born out of the polytheistic Yahwism and the resulting merge between Yahweh and the chief Canaanite god El was the way I just kept pulling the thread until it all came apart. The inconsistencies between an omnibenevolent god (El) and violent massacring war god (Yahweh) make a lot more sense once you know they used to be two separate gods.

  • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    In principle I agree, but he doesn’t really have a choice. Other world leaders are providing the funds to continue the war in the first place. If Zelensky does something they don’t like, they can just stop the funding and end the war on Russian terms.

    • cygnus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      If Ukrainians want to they can make this another Afghanistan, or even worse given their much better infrastructure and manufacturing capacity. Their will to continue fighting is the only variable.

          • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            The one we’re talking about.

            The taliban had the support of Pakistan, as well as Iran and Russia - that’s the only way that kind of war could last for 20 years. That’s essentially where we are now with western backing, but if the west pulls support… Ukraine can last only so long on will-power alone. The same could be said for Russia, but as far as I can tell there isn’t an active risk of their allies pulling support yet.

            edit: far be it for me to point out that’s why there’s been so much circling of wagons to keep the US involved and so much panic about trump pulling us out

            • cygnus@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              I think you’re overstating how much help the Afghans got from PK/US the first time PK/RU/IR the second time, but in any case Ukraine is far better able to sustain itself given their much more developed industry and infrastructure, and the fact that the bulk of the country is unoccupied. It wouldn’t be a cakewalk by any means, but Ukraine wouldn’t cease to exist.

              • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                I don’t really think I am, but fair enough.

                Ukraine might have more advanced infrastructure than Afghanistan, but having that infrastructure within reach of Russian missiles and airstrikes means that they’d have to defend it or else lose the means to sustain a continued resistance. Again, I don’t think people appreciate just how much trouble Ukraine would be in if the west pulled support before a ceasefire deal is struck - Ukrainian forces aren’t guerilla fighters. If Russia didn’t already have the upper hand now, they certainly would once Ukraine was left to maintain their resistance alone - and then it would really only be a question of how long Russian citizens will put up with their wartime economy (and how many soldiers NK is willing to lose).

                • cygnus@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  There’s absolutely no way Russia can take and hold all of Ukraine – it would be a real challenge to keep the provinces they’ve already carved off if Ukrainians keep pressing the issue. I’m certainly not advocating for the end of Western support – au contraire – but it’s really, really hard to occupy and pacify a country, especially one the size of Ukraine with a population of nearly 40 million. The USSR had enormous resources to deploy in its imperial expansion and was mostly unopposed, whereas today’s Russia doesn’t benefit from either point and it’s harder to be a rogue state in today’s world.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 🏆@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    On one hand, I get it; it’s their business and they should be at any negotiating tables that involve them. On the other, if, say, Germany made a deal with Putin to leave Ukraine alone that didn’t promise something of Ukraine’s to Russia, would that be bad? It’s one thing to negotiate with shit that doesn’t belong to you, like promising Russia can keep Donsk or some shit, but if they just sold them something of theirs to get them to fuck off, that would be helpful would it not?

  • ZK686@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Yet, all other countries are supposed to send unlimited amounts of money and weapons? This is the same bullshit with everyone else… you want all our money, and that’s it.

      • ZK686@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        And that’s the US’s problem right? We’re the World Police only when it’s convenient for some, but not others? If it that’s the case, I really wish people would stop hating on our government when we’re doing things like financing small proxy wars…

      • ZK686@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        And that’s the problem I have with how “some” of the government is selling this thing… “if we don’t send UNLIMITED funds to Russia, they’ll keep taking over everything!” And I just don’t buy it. Putin doesn’t want to be surrounded by NATO, that’s the sole reason he’s going after Ukraine. He’s not going to “keep going” like some are proclaiming, because he knows that will be a death sentence.

        • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I think anybody above the age of 5 can see that your deranged opinion is not based on real-life events.

  • CriticalMiss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    The only thing that’s worse than having the US as your enemy, is having the US as your ally.