• alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      85
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      We (Europe) already did most of the heavy lifting for Ukraine. The US mostly gave old stockpiles of weapons that they would’ve needed to destroy anyway. We are the ones actually paying cash to keep them afloat.

      The problem is, in the post-WW2 order, our defense and our defense industry was made dependent on the USA by design. And even up until last November, Europe didn’t want to challenge this arrangement and just went full steam ahead with this arrangement, ordering US made weapons. I think Europe was in denial that Biden could lose or that NATO could ever end.

      Only France, and to a limited extent, Sweden and Turkey, have independent defense industries.

      In the future, we will have it again. And Ukraine will actually be a key player.

      But in the short term, there is no magical button to press that can produce the arms.

      Undoing decades of integration isn’t going to be easy.

      • errer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 minutes ago

        Putin is going to make a hard move into the baltics during Trump’s first 2 years, including NATO countries. And Europe won’t be able to do shit about it. They need defenses now and European leadership needs to fast track it.

        • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 minutes ago

          you talk as if Europe doesn’t have agency, or a military.

          they do. they have gaps in their capability that have been created by the departure of US. and they no longer have the overwhelming advantage against Russia, but the thing is Russia will still get absolutely smoked.

          the only thing that has changed, is it will be a far bloodier fight. Europe and America are both casualty averse. the prospect of things like Bucha Mariupol and Irpin happening in their cities, the population isnt ready for that.

          (And to be clear, what happened in those towns and cities were a crime against humanity, after what Russia did there the Ukrainians understood very well this is a genocidal total war, its kill or be killed, and I dont think Europe has understood thats what its going to be.)

        • philpo@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 minutes ago

          Maybe,just maybe, look up your world politics again.

          • All baltic nations(except Russia) are NATO members
          • All baltic nations (except Russia) are EU members and therefore covered by the Lisbon accords as well - which are much more far reaching than what NATO accords cover,btw.

          So while the Baltics are in a shitty situation it’s not like Russia could attack a “non NATO” Baltic nation - as your “including” make it seem.

          And currently there are 40.000 Soldiers of the ARF either deployed in the Baltics or ready to deployed within short notice - while the EU battlegroup is also available and gaining speed. The former is - for the first time - not sustained by US troops mainly,the later one of course never was. And as the ARF is a very British corps the UK has made it very clear that the ARF also operates under the British nuclear deterrence - so did France with both battlegroups.

          Will that be enough to deter Putin? Who knows. Is it nothing? Definitely not - at the moment it would be, even without US support, enough to cause either the Ukrainian front or the “new front” (wherever that would be) to collapse fast.

          Your narrative is either influenced by Russian misinformation or you are Russian misinformation - it is known that Russia tries to “it’s not worth it to even fight” narrative heavily into Europe and it has done so in Ukraine before.