With no end to numerous protracted conflicts - not least in Ukraine, three years to the day since the full-scale Russian invasion - UN chief António Guterres on Monday scorned the world’s “warmongers” for trampling on people’s most fundamental rights.
“must”, … or what??
Pretentious idiocy.
Mental-rabies NEEDS to be dealt-with AS mental-rabies.
Ideology/prejudice/“religion” which prohibits objectivity, & is identity-anchor, HAS to be dealt-with as functionally subhuman: mere-animal mind/determination,
because it IS mere-animal mind: the imprint->reaction mind of unreasoning herdbeasts, of unreasoning pack-animals.
Continuing to pretend that ideology/prejudice/“religion”'s programming is “reasonable” & reason-WITH-able, … is simply us making ourselves into helpers of their slaughtering our own children: it is outright criminality.
Churchill, who simultaneously was prejudiced-scum who enforced lots of needless destruction-of-life in India AND he was the guy who held the West together during WW2
Anyways, as Churchill identified, there is zero point in arguing-with, or reasoning-with, either drunks or fanatics.
More-properly-resolved, it is the imprint->reaction mind that there isn’t any point in treating as “rational”.
Kahneman1 mind ( lower-forebrain, ttbomk ).
IF someone demonstrates that they’re solidly within imprint->reaction mind, disallowing/ignoring/denying evidence, correct-reasoning, etc, THEN accept that, deal-with that, & treat them as incapable-of-rationality human-shaped-animals.
MANAGE THEM, DO NOT LET THEIR WON’T-KNOW MANAGE US!!
Suspending that decision endlessly, helps them to slaughter our lives.
& I’m fed-up with pretending otherwise being treated as “the only valid position”.
WHEN DEALING-WITH RABIES, TREAT IT AS RABIES.
WHEN DEALING-WITH WON’T-KNOW-EVIDENCE/WON’T-REASON, TREAT IT AS IDEOLOGICAL-PREJUDICE.
To be honest, I don’t expect much of humankind to survive the next-century, if any does, simply because pretending/ignoring/denying is sooo fundamentally preferred to actual-honesty/objectivity.
“Actions speak louder than words” people say … but “words are more valid than actions” is what our “journalism” and our “governing” and our pseudo-accountability and our legal-systems etc all enforce/“prove”/enact.
Only when there are nearly-no-human-lives-left will that be force-changed??
Possible…
Too bad for the future-generations, but that’s our-generation’s determination, isn’t it?
Better to murder-off all their future-lives, than to have spine/integrity now?
sickening, repugnant, but … proudly-committed-by-many, now.
“Accelerationists”, especially.
they “must” do this, or that … OR WHAT??
FORCE consequences, morons, or allow them to slaughter us all.
“governing”, my arse.
Occupying-authority-while-NOT-governing, more like.
Accountability-repellent seems to be what political-authority is made-of??
_ /\ _
PS: I’m not advocating-for what the ideologues do, I’m advocating for accepting that at the individual level, IF an individual demonstrates that they are immune-to-reason, THEN treat that-individual as immune-to-reason.
the ideologues judge people as mere-animal if they’re outside-of-the-ideologues’-IDENTITY, & that’s a pre-judging mechanism, not an objective-judging-based-on-actual-behavior basis.
The Hamas programming that Jews cannot be human, the Zionist programming that Palestinians cannot be human, etc, that is the pre-judging that I’m calling mental-rabies.
There ARE people, of my nationality, & yours, who war against considered-reasoning ( upper-forebrain, ttbomk ), trying to enforce imprint->reaction’s totalitarian dominion.
The Catholic inquisition tried, for centuries, to murder its way to unquestioning-lordhood, the “Christian” nationalists are working on recreating that kind of animal-human totalitarian dominion in the US of A right now.
ALL the Abrahamic-religions, ALL the Dharmic-religions ( of India ), ALL kinds of Indigenous religions, fundamentalist-atheism, physicalism-existentialism, ANY paradigm can be converted into an imprint->reaction ideology,
AND any religion can be held to be a considered-reasoning religion, by humans.
It ISN’T which “label” a person is wearing, it is their behavior which need be judged, & treated-as-it-actually-is.
( I realized after writing that people were going to perhaps-intentionally misinterpret it to claim that I’m just gaslighting, just pushing ideology while pretending to stand counter to ideology, simply because I hadn’t identified that it is individual behavior which shows the real truth.
Hopefully, that’s fixed, now, clearly-enough. : )