• Mordikan@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    There is so much AI hype and so much anti-AI hype, that I doubt it really will.

    For the last 4 years, we have perpetually been 90 days from both the AI market crashing and AI stealing all our jobs at the same time.

    My thought is the AI market won’t crash because especially in data engineering and devops there is an inherent worth. I think there will be a potential downturn in the volume of cash flowing into perhaps after the big players like OpenAI and Anthropic go to IPO, but the market itself will remain stable. Similar to how the housing bubble crash didn’t actually wipe out the housing market (with or without the US govt saving the big players - it still would have survived on its own even if those players did not).

    • LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      My thought is the AI market won’t crash because especially in data engineering and devops there is an inherent worth.

      Did you see Anthropic’s IPO filing? The company is upside down and there’s so much commingling between 3 or 4 companies that when one goes the rest will topple like dominoes.

      What won’t crash are the billionaires at the top. See, they’re going to cash out with piles of money and leave the index fund investors (e.g. the every day person) holding the bag.

      • Mordikan@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        AI isn’t anywhere close to being a pump and dump scheme as you speculate.

        The reality is it would be closer to the dot com bubble (if anything at all). Most of the damage would be in physical infrastructure like datacenters which would be an asset write-off. However, there is tangible profitability in AI which we didn’t see in dot com. That would imply if the demand does not exist (which we know it does looking at DevOps, BI, etc) that should things go south, it would be a market correction and not a market collapse.

        Again, the weak point and therefore the most hurt would be overvalued segments which is basically the datacenter infrastructure, but that doesn’t imply a collapse/pop only a downturn and correction.

        • zebidiah@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          The difference with the dot Com bubble is that we built the modern internet on it’s ruins, all that fibre that went into the ground and stayed dark is now lit up and we are all benefiting from it. The gpus and ram going into datacenters is a consumable resource that will be burned out and useless for hobbyists, these aren’t going to be the next gen of xeon chips hitting the market as soon as someone brings a cheap motherboard to market that sockets them…

          I think nothing under the sun is new and we’ve all seen all this before. Specifically where I see a lot of parallels is with GPS hardware manufacturers and also Dropbox.

          Back in the day Tom Tom and Magellan and Garmin ruled the world, then iPhone came out with maps and they evaporated. Dropbox was hugely successful and a revolutionary offering, until email providers offered the same thing for free and with more convenience.

          The tech is super cool, and it’s only going to get better but don’t pay attention to the fools who run AI companies, they will go down and they will crash the economy. I would rather trust Chinese AI than anything clammy Sam Altman and Wario try to sell me on…

      • hyperion626@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        There is no way it doesn’t get propped up by the government at this rate. AI is the next big weapon in, well, everything digital. And they won’t want other countries having the biggest stick.

        • LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          There is no way it doesn’t get propped up by the government at this rate.

          There absolutely is a way. It starts with people hold their governments and representatives accountable.

          The AI companies can and absolutely should fail. AI itself isn’t going anywhere. That Genie is out of the box.

          • Mordikan@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            “It starts with people hold their governments and representatives accountable”.

            That is basically a non-answer and doesn’t mean anything. The reality is AI is classified a national security priority and therefore has the US govt to prevent it from running out of money.

            You could argue that the US has already lost the AI race to China, though. The race isn’t won by building the gigantic LLMs. It isn’t about 1 million token context windows or 1 trillion parameter models. It’s about sentiment. Deepseek and the other distilled models take a novel approach with MoE and strict use case training, but ultimately its the willingness of people/companies to use the AI that results in the win.

            US adoption is still the highest world-wide, but China is starting to take the lead on that and have they have stronger willingness to use it.

            • LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              That is basically a non-answer and doesn’t mean anything.

              You struggling to understand a statement doesn’t make it a non-answer.

              The reality is AI is classified a national security priority and therefore has the US govt to prevent it from running out of money.

              Your conflating the current technology AI and AI companies.

              but ultimately its the willingness of people/companies to use the AI that results in the win.

              Ah, you’re one of those people.