• driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      No, the risk is the probability of a claim times the value of a claim. If you just charge that is mathematically proven that the insurance pool is going to fail. The actuarial adjustment is there to create a surplus that guarantee the survival of the pool.

        • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The return of capital is what the owners of the capital expect to get to have their money invested on the insurance company instead of moving their money to other investment opportunities.

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            But the capital provided by the owners is what is used to backstop the insurance and ensure the pot always exists. The amount of capital needed is calculated by the actuaries but supplied by the owners.

            This is why I’m confused why you listed both an interest on capital and an actuarial adjustment.

            • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Each product needs to sustain itself (risk+actuarial adjustment), pay for itself (admin and distribution costs) and give a return to the owners. You can’t use the actuarial adjustment as return of capital or the company is going to fail eventually.

              The owners of the capital want the pool to sustain itself and a return of capital forever. You cant use the same money for both.