• blartcap_@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    What detail is that? It can’t be the non-consensual touch since I’ve mentioned that in most of my comments outright, including my last reply to you.

    • Sarah Valentine@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It’s the fact that non-consensually touching a stranger’s child is absolutely unacceptable behavior. Why do you have such a hard time understanding that? Are you looking to get away with something like this in the future and want to make sure it’s downplayed sufficiently? Get outta here with this pretense of not understanding the issue.

      • blartcap_@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        So the thing that was regularly addressed is the thing you think nobody is talking about. And there’s not a single comment saying non-consensual touching is okay or questioning if it can be, but somehow you imagined there was.

        Meanwhile you’re ignoring what I told you what I’m actually questioning. Don’t pretend like you were ever trying to have a conversation when you were just looking to get angry about something nobody said.