• daannii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Nothing I suggested targets specific nations or ethnicities.

    Change is inevitable.
    We can’t preserve everything forever.

    We especially can’t use that as an excuse to not do anything about the problem of stripping this world of every natural resource and expanding populations until nothing is left.

    Why is giving people access to contraceptives, safe abortions, and adoption so horrible?

    I honestly don’t see why anyone thinks this would be harmful.
    Let people choose. Let people have options.

    Forcing pregnancies on people who don’t want them from a lack of contraceptive access, or safe abortions. or pushing the narrative that a child is only yours if it has your genetics is outdated.

    These things are harmful. Not the suggestions I made.

    • qevlarr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      It will not stay voluntary if you keep presenting not having children as a solution to climate change.

      • daannii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I chose to recycle. Because it’s an option. And I want to.

        People having a choice is not forcing anyone to do anything. Jesus.

        Taking away access to contraceptives and abortion is the forced choice.

        • qevlarr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Bailey: We should have fewer children to solve climate problems

          Motte: Access to contraceptives and abortion should not be taken away

          Holy cow