The Linux Foundation has twelve platinum members, which donate $500000 per year, followed by twelve gold members, who donate $100000 per year. Below these two primary tiers lie the silver peasants, who each donate $5000-$25000 per year, based on number of employees. Looking at the list of twelve platinum members, I noticed something interesting.

Of the twelve platinum companies, six are “AI” companies or companies with massive investments in “AI”: Google, Huawei, Facebook, Microsoft, Oracle, and IBM/Red Hat. Then there’s Samsung Electronics, which is raking in stupendous amounts of money thanks to the “AI” bubble. Additionally, one of the gold members is Anthropic, another major “AI” company and makers of “Claude”, the sloppiest of slopcoding tools.[…]

Anyway, a large chunk of the funding the Linux Foundation, Linus Torvald’s employer, receives is coming from increasingly desperate companies frantically trying to convince a populace deeply skeptical and often downright hostile towards “AI” to spend money on “AI” before the bubble bursts.

  • 73QjabParc34Vebq@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    The Linux Foundation is ‘corrupt’, but not for the kernel, funding Linus is the green washing.

    The Linux Foundation is a lobbying organisation for Big Tech, not Free Software evangelicals.

    • esc@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Do they claim to be Free Software evangelicals and not a neutral org for big tech? IIRC being a neutral lobbying org is their whole thing.

      • 73QjabParc34Vebq@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        They didn’t pick the name “Linux” by mistake, it’s a deliberate misdirection for the masses, while having the fallback of “we didn’t lie”.

        Same with the subtle move from Free Software to Open Source. They benifit from peoples misunderstanding.

        • esc@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yes, and? They aren’t the great saviours of Free Software but an entity that serves the purpose to the big tech corps.

          None of my points are invalidated.

          • 73QjabParc34Vebq@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I wasn’t trying to invalidate you, just discuss the Linux Foundation. But I will bet that “small IT company I’ve worked before had ten times that money” has 10 times less power than The Linux Foundation. And I’ll point out that the Linux Foundation projects get separate funding and engineering from their members.

            • esc@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Obviously, point was that a $<10 milions a year isn’t all that big number for an org size of LF.