• SalamiDommie@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    So by 2034 they either expect the Liberal Hegemon to have gained enough ground there OR they expect the rest of the world to be more accommodating of their system.

    Reality is probably a little of both.

  • Kirp123@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    You have to be some special kind of stupid to go to a country where you can get killed for just existing.

  • robocall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    1 day ago

    I imagine it will be similar to the 2022 world cup in Qatar. No rainbows allowed. People detained or driven to the airport for wearing rainbows.

      • jobbies@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        In Saudi women can’t show anything. They must wear an abaya (head-to-toe black robes) and be accompanied by a male gaurdian (husband, father, son) at all times.

        No, I’m not making it up.

        • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Those restrictions have been loosened considerably, especially for non-Saudi women, though wearing an abbaya is still wise in order to avoid ogling and sexual harassment. And it’s no longer required for foreign women to cover their hair when in public, or for any women to be escorted by a husband or make relative. MBS regarded the religious police (the wonderfully named Society for Encouraging Virtue and Discouraging Vice) as a competing power center, so since they like keeping their heads attached to their bodies as much as most people, they’re nowhere near as intrusive as they used to be.

          It’s still by no means a feminist paradise, of course, but under MBS, Saudi Arabia seems to be shifting from a medieval theocracy to a slightly secular totalitarian state, more like Iraq under Saddam.

          • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            There’s reports of women being jailed for tweeting about women’s rights in Saudi Arabia over the past five years, more than one. May have taken one step forward, but they’re still a hundred steps back.

        • PepperoniNipple@lazysoci.al
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          Legally, women in Saudi Arabia are no longer required by law to wear a black abaya or cover their hair. The male guardianship requirement for daily public life has been dismantled; women over 21 can legally travel, get passports, live independently, and enter public spaces without a male guardian’s permission or accompaniment.

          The historical enforcement of these rules were rooted in a specific interpretation of Sharia (Islamic law), layered heavily over ancient Arabian tribal customs:

          • The Concept of Modesty (Haya): In Islamic tradition, modesty is a core spiritual virtue expected of both men and women. In conservative Gulf societies, this was heavily institutionalized into physical concealment for women to prevent Fitnah (temptation or social discord).
          • The Concept of Protection (Wilayah): The male guardianship system (Nizam Al-Wilayah) originally evolved out of tribal structures where the desert environment was harsh and inter-tribal warfare was common. Men were expected to physically protect women from vulnerability, harm, or exploitation. Over the generations, the Saudi state codified this protective role into an absolute legal system of control, treating adult women as legal minors for life.

          While Saudi culture was always conservative, the absolute, rigid enforcement of the all-black abaya and the strict segregation of the sexes by religious police was actually a political reaction to a specific historical event: The 1979 Grand Mosque Seizure.

          In 1979, hardline religious extremists violently seized the Holy Mosque in Mecca, accusing the Saudi royal family of becoming too Westernized and secular. To pacify the religious establishment and maintain political legitimacy, the Saudi government struck a bargain with the ultra-conservative Wahhabi clerics. The state gave the religious police (Mutawa) massive authority to strictly enforce gender segregation, mandatory face coverings, and the head-to-toe black abaya in public.

          You sound like a child when you criticize cultural things without context or understanding why they exist in the first place. You always paint them as malicious, as automatically evil or oppressive, but it is always more complex than that. I really hate this side of the Internet, and it will never end, because every year there is a new generation of 12-years old who will repeat the exact same mistakes again and again. They don’t pay attention to History or Algebra either class because they say dumb shit like “why will we ever need this?” And well, this is what happens. We get ignorant people who can easily dehumanize/demonize a whole subset of people.

          Like, lowkey, your comment makes it “subconsciously” seem like “Arabs and Muslims are rapists” even if you blame culture, the government or the law, you’re already creating this prejudge that is so harmful, and it only and literally benefits the Jeffrey Epstein Class. It keeps us divided, fighting each other, instead of looking up.

          All the cultures in the world have issues with violence, domestic violence, misogyny, racism, xenophobia, child abuse and so on. Some grew quicker than others, thanks to technology, the economy, and more importantly: luck. So, to come here and try to stomp younger cultures because they’re not growing as quick as you want them to, just makes you look like an insane violent unreasonable monster. I am glad you are not a judge or a God. You’d suck as one.

        • BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          20% of the parliament is women. Beating the US congress.

          The guardianship rules doesn’t apply for working and traveling. So any woman over 21 can apply for a passport and leave if they feel like it.

          77% of women has a secondary (high school) education and 37% participate in the workforce.

          Yes Saudi Arabia has a long freaking way to go, but they’ve been closing the gender gap in recent years.

          Womens rights is a theme among several middle eastern countries, I’m naive enough to believe they understand it will benefit society and not done so entirely to befriend Europe

          • jobbies@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            24 hours ago

            The guardianship rules doesn’t apply for working and traveling.

            Oh that makes it better, they only need to be accompanied when going about their daily business. Got it.

            any woman over 21 can apply for a passport

            So long as they have the permission of their male guardian, the approval of the authorities and they’re not trying to flee with their kids.

            77% of women has a secondary (high school) education

            Thats not the flex you think it is.

            Yes Saudi Arabia has a long freaking way to go

            You could say that again.

          • belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Ah yes, 20% of the government appointed puppets are women.

            That’ll make their theocratic genderapartheid much better.

  • SGGeorwell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The rehabilitation of the country that produced 9/11 is really sickening. I’m disappointed in any American who gives them anything.

  • Eternal192@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s a place to avoid no matter if you are LGBTQ+ or a woman or even a man, some religious zealot might still try to kill you.

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I lived there for several years a couple of decades ago. It was an extraordinarily safe place, compared to the US, despite the occasional terrorist attack. I never had trouble with the locals, even the religious whackjobs. They’re generally kind-hearted people.

      Gay colleagues had a great time there: it was on the DL but very low-risk. What happened in private homes stayed private. For various cultural reasons, quite a number of Saudi men would have sex with men-- especially foreigners, who they believed were less prone to gossiping than other Saudi guys were.

      Something to keep in mind in places like KSA with draconian laws is that it’s all about hypocrisy, turning a blind eye, and sporadic, performative selective enforcement. Another example is that I often heard Saudis tell me that, despite the many restrictions on life there, at least they didn’t have drug problems like the US or Europe. But in the local newspapers, every few weeks, there’d be a photo of some minor prince doing a ribbon-cutting at a new rehab clinic.

      A local proverb, attributed to the Prophet, is: “A sin that is hidden is half-forgiven.” The rationale is that, if you do it publicly, it encourages others. But the Saudi police were actually far more respectful of entering people’s homes than US or European police are (unless you get on a powerful person’s shit list).

      It’s a good idea to learn a little about a place before you decide to visit. I’ve been all over the world, and Saudi Arabia is culturally one of the places that is most different from anything you’d encounter in the US.

  • lemmelemmy@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Why would anyone would travel to Saudi Arabia for World Cup?

    Also why would you have the World Cup in a desert?

    Honestly, why do people bother with fifa still? “Richer” countries won’t bother to play anymore because they get pennies. They save up their energy for better paying leagues. And on the other hand there are people putting their life on the table. This isn’t fun or fair.

    • Rothe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, unfortunately lots of willing morons travelling to the fascist shithole of the US for a world cup. I am not having high hopes of them developing a discerning sense of morality before 2034.

    • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      This entire region should have organized one world cup, instead of the farce that was Qatar.
      Saudi Arabia + Qatar + Kuwait + UAE and maybe Bahrain. The rule about hosts automatically qualifying would have to go, but together it would make some sense, and they would actually have enough different cities for a proper world cup.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Me countries basically have been buying up sports leagues and orgs to stave off thier own economic problems, also to sportswash.

      • SalamiDommie@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        To those who maybe didn’t understand what Tollana said above.

        Middle Eastern (Me) countries have been trying to purchase good faith with foreigners in Europe and the North America by buying or creating sports leagues. The contribute to the GDP of said middle eastern countries and force travel to them increasing exposure and visitation.

        There is a lot more to say on this topic, but I am trying to keep it short.

  • PepperoniNipple@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Why do people, especially Americans, talk and behave like they are less violent than Arabs or Muslims? Both liberals and republicans still do that, and it looks really bad, because the truth is, you’re more likely to die in the USA than a place like Saudi Arabia, even if you are gay. It’s so easy to prove it, I don’t understand why are people still falling for Jeffrey Epstein Class propaganda that keeps us divided for nonsensical bullshit.

    Can Saudi Arabia sentence someone to death for homosexual acts? Yes.

    Do they routinely execute people just for being gay? No. It is not a routine occurrence. The death penalty is more often associated with cases involving additional charges, such as rape or other serious crimes. I am not excusing them, nor justifying them, I think the law and culture need to change, but doing it with bombs and bullets will never work, it makes it worse, actually.

    You’re more likely to die in the USA than Saudi Arabia if you compare their homicide rates:

    • Saudi Arabia - 285 deaths in 2019; rate of 0.935, which means “0.935 people die per every 100,000 inhabitants.”
    • The USA - 19,796 deaths in 2023; rate of 5.76.

    Just to give you an idea, the USA is closer to being like Mexico, Russia or Zimbabwe regarding violence. If you sort them by count, Mexico is top #4 while the USA is top #6 in the entire world. The jump in Count is massive, but still, both countries lose over 20,000+ people to homicides yearly. Compare it to other rich countries like China, Russia, India, Indonesia or the UK for the sake of comparison:

    • Mexico - 32,252 deaths in 2023; rate of 24.859.
    • China - 7,157 deaths in 2020; rate of 0.502.
    • Russia - 11,327 deaths in 2021; rate of 6.765.
    • India - 40,130 deaths in 2022; rate of 2.815.
    • Indonesia - 847 deaths in 2022; rate of 0.304.
    • UK (England & Wales) - 684 deaths in 2021; rate of 1.148.

    If you wonder about the Middle East, here are some examples (and they’ve been heavily bombed/in war with the USA for decades):

    • Lebanon - 128 deaths in 2020; rate of 2.245.
    • Iran - 1,936 people in 2014; rate of 2.375.
    • Iraq - 3,339 deaths in 2013; rate of 9.464.
    • Iraq (Central Iraq) - 5,459 deaths in 2021; rate of 15.397.
    • Iraq. (Kurdistan Region) - 111 deaths in 2013; rate of 2.246.
    • Afghanistan - 1,613 deaths in 2021; rate of 4.032.
    • Egypt - 1,360 deaths in 2017; rate of 1.312.
    • Yemen - 1,703 deaths in 2013; rate of 5.810.

    Btw, Zimbabwe has a rate of 6.75. Americans love to make fun of that place and all the others. They call them “shitholes,” and the way they express themselves about them, is always filled with ire or rancor. Truth is, the USA killed millions of Arabs and Muslims throughout history in the name of “prudeness and morality,” but the one who is actually the trashy, violent immoral piece of shit is the USA, not a single Middle Eastern or Asiatic country which are still growing culturally. Even Japan has the same issues a lot of racist assholes criticize the Middle East for, but they don’t criticize Japan like that, because they’re just fucking stupid and mentally ill. They don’t have the capacity to see the hypocrisy and irony.

    In summary, it looks really silly and bad whenever you see a post talking about a Middle East country, and then you see most, if not all the comments, most likely Americans and Europeans, saying how dangerous, how violent, how “retarded” or “barbaric” the country is while the fact is, the USA is much worse. This is the type of American Exceptionalism, Blue MAGA behavior that is still so ingrained and present in all Americans and Europeans, no matter if liberal or conservative. They all dehumanized Arabs and Muslims up to the point they automatically reject them no matter what.

    If you still talk shit about the Middle East with superficial shit, like criticizing their issues with Child Abuse, something you don’t criticize Japan with the same passion although both are equally significant problems you can’t fix with bombs or bullets, you’re an imbecile racist and also a terrorist, one worse than Hamas and Hezbollah combined. You’re morally inferior and more abhorrent than those orphaned children seeking justice/vengeance for the parents your taxes killed with a bomb. You refuse to understand their anger because you are morally and emotionally too weak to handle such a heavy toll. You instead take the easy shortcut, which is to be a racist.

    You can see cultures around the world like children who are still growing up. All of them had their phases, starting in caves, then tribes that participated in sacrifices and rituals, then became more civilized, participated in bloody wars, all of them still have issues regarding identity and tolerance… If you really think killing Arabs and Muslims, conquering them, erasing them all to replace them with Americans and “American values, culture, traditions” you’re just an idiot. You’re a violent child.

    • SalamiDommie@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Wow it’s almost as if you remove two cities from the US you get MAJOR changes in homicides. You also aren’t comparing the population differences.

      Sure the US has a higher rate, it is also a huge land mass with 300,000,000 people. Middle Eastern countries are only larger than some US states. Drop New York, California and Chicago and again the rates free fall.

      America is so safe our biggest threat is too much food.

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The Middle East (and North Africa) is a huge place, and there’s wide variation in risk as you go from country to country and within countries. There are plenty of places there where I’d think twice before going down a dark alley. But there are even more of those places in the US, and the risk of getting killed there is even greater.

      Blue MAGA behavior that is still so ingrained and present in all Americans and Europeans, no matter if liberal or conservative.

      You’re exaggerating, but sadly, not all that much. I have a different perspective because I’ve been married to someone from the region for a very long time, speak, read and write Arabic serviceably, and have travelled a lot in the region over an extended period. But I still occasionally find baggage I’m carrying that gets in the way of seeing people as they are, instead of trying to force them to conform to preconceived notions. At least, unlike far too many Americans, the people in the region are generally sophisticated enough to distinguish individuals from their governments.

    • Impound4017@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      It’s wild to me that you’d call countries in the Middle East “young”, given that the Middle East has, throughout human history, been one of the primary hotspots of human development, all the way back to the time of early human migration from Africa. The Middle East is the very opposite of young. See: Persia and Egypt

      Like, many of the things that you can be executed for in Saudi Arabia are such because of a literalist interpretation of the Quran combined with significant latitude afforded to judges because of a lack of prescribed punishment in doctrine (Tazir). Consequentially, Saudi Arabia sits in third place worldwide after China and Iran for number of executions at 356 people executed in 2025. A staggering number when you remember the fact that it has a population of only ~35,000,000 people.

      Indeed, there are differing beliefs within Islam about how literally to interpret the Quran in the first place, as well as how harshly (if at all) one should punish such transgressions, because the document is fucking old. The cultural development you speak of did happen; the culture isn’t young. Saudi Arabia just so happens to be an absolute monarchy with a particularly strict interpretation of religious and legal doctrine.

      Just so we’re clear: the point I’m making isn’t that Saudia Arabia or the Middle East more broadly are somehow culturally inferior or less developed relative to any other nation or region. I am well aware, for example, that the US has the exact same problem with religious fundamentalism (something which I also loudly decry) but in both cases it represents a resurgence of fundamentalism within already developed cultures, not a linear progression from “barbaric” to “civilized” or whatever that nonsense about tribes and caves was.

      Stop giving the absolute monarchy that regularly executes dissidents, journalists, and queer people the benefit of the doubt via whataboutism and false equivalencies between Saudi Arabia and the Middle East as a whole. You’re either being played a fool, or you’re actively excusing something monstrous in exactly the same way that anyone who ignores the United States’ (many) atrocities is.

      • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        because the document is fucking old

        It’s also fucking opaque. Much of the Qur’an is written in a highly allusive, poetic way, referencing events and controversies that there’s little to no extra-Quranic historic record of. Often it’s not possible to connect a particular sura to anything at all. There’s a considerable body of personal accounts of the life of the Prophet and the time after him (hadith) with varying degrees of credibility, and a huge amount commentary on the Qur’an and the hadith accumulated over many centuries (tafsir, kind of like the Talmud). Much of the actual practice of Islam is a combination of ancient local practices (e.g., women being fully veiled, which was a pre-Islamic Persian custom not practiced in Arabia), accretions of interpretations of religious texts, and traditions.

        Stop giving the absolute monarchy that regularly executes dissidents, journalists, and queer people the benefit of the doubt via whataboutism and false equivalencies between Saudi Arabia and the Middle East as a whole.

        Yeah, Saudi Arabia is a corner case. It’s sort of the Arabian equivalent of a US bunch of hillbilly glossolalist snake-juggling bigots, who found themselves sitting on a lake of oil. But in other parts of the MENA, you can find highly sophisticated urban people who make most Americans look like hicks, and ancient communities sustaining millennia of cultural continuity. The diversity of the region is extreme.

    • thethrilloftime69@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I gave you an upvote. The West is on such a high horse acting like women’s rights and lgbtq rights aren’t an ongoing conversation in our societies. It wasn’t that long ago that sexual minorities and women had less rights. Societies views on different topics is constantly in flux. People change their opinions over time. Especially if they’ve had had enough money to fund a decent education system for decades.

      Muslim countries aren’t inherently sexist and homophobic, at least not more so than Western societies. They have had their economies devastated for decades and so that leads to lack of education and resources which leads to the same things that happen in impoverished parts of the West, religiosity, homophobia and patriarchy.

      If the West wanted to do women favors in the middle east, they would stop starting wars and funding fascists. But no, of course, these societies are inherently evil and need to wiped off the map.

      • PepperoniNipple@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I still think it’s more important to deinflate the egos of Americans and Europeans first, because they are causing more harm to the world with their influence than these smaller and oppressed countries like Arab or African ones.

        You will always see people that respond like you. “We can do both.” “Both can be true at the same time.” But you never see them believe it, respect it or practice it at all. Just read all the comments in this post. They all treat younger cultures like shit. They rather kill them than let them grow and learn like their own did. They have 0 tolerance.

        • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          “We can do both.”

          Yeah. I agree. Start with what’s within your span of control. MENA people want freedom, good government and rule of law as much as anyone does. Reducing foreign interference and no longer propping up corrupt despots would go a long way towards enabling people to be more empowered there. But beyond that, they have to do the work themselves: you can’t bomb people to democracy and human rights.