… Meanwhile another comment in the thread was talking about someone swallowing Bibi’s semen but I guess that’s okay.

**UPDATE: I challenged the ban because it was just a pun and they lifted it. **

  • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    “That includes one-quarter of women under 50 and 20 percent of men under 50, who said they would not back a qualified female candidate for president, while 13 percent of men and women over 50 said they wouldn’t be open to supporting a woman for president.”

    This is the only line about this, and the poll did not breakdown this derived stat by voter registration. So no. This does not support your thesis that democrat voters didn’t vote for Harris because she was a woman.

    Not only is this survey not categorizing people along partisan lines, they don’t broach the individual topic of Harris’ campaign beyond her disastrous campaign introduction and the lack of primary.

    So better luck next time. Do read the things you post, or better yet, spend more than ten seconds. Because this article and the conntected source poll do not even support the headline it has.

      • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Which are half of number of republican voters that have voted in the last 3 presidential elections.

        Most voters aren’t registered with a party, since it’s not required to vote, most people don’t care about party primaries since they have no constitutional basis or protections and have no legal requirements for operation and that is the exclusive reason you register with a party if you’re not planning on running.

        Most Democrat voters in these recent state elections were not registered democrats.