The International Court of Justice has said it’s a Genocide
In 2025.
If you want to change the definition I am sure you would also mean Holocaust was also just a bad thing.
I’m not changing anything. I’m agreeing with the ICJ. You’re changing the meaning of the word to be “bad things are happening” since you’re claiming that Israel “has been carrying out Genocide since [Palestine’s] inception”.
Which is ludicrous considering they had independent elections, and a population boom of going from 600k to 5 million in 100 years.
Palestine was the land before that, true. Not the nation, though. That was also established in the same UN resolution that created Israel.
So, from what you’re saying I understand that you’re the proponent of returning the entire area back to Iran? They’re the closest we can get to Persia, I think.
I understand that you’re the proponent of returning the entire area back to Iran? They’re the closest we can get to Persia, I think.
That would be your position, silly. You’re the one who supports removing the existing population and replacing it with another who claims historical ties.
“European Jews” is like calling Palestinians “Iranians”. Makes exactly as much sense, mate.
they can’t help themselves from genocidal tendencies
Right, because, as we know, Israelis are a hive-mind and if one of them wants to commit genocide, then we know that ALL of them have genocidal tendencies.
In 2025.
I’m not changing anything. I’m agreeing with the ICJ. You’re changing the meaning of the word to be “bad things are happening” since you’re claiming that Israel “has been carrying out Genocide since [Palestine’s] inception”.
Which is ludicrous considering they had independent elections, and a population boom of going from 600k to 5 million in 100 years.
Israel came into existence in 1948. Palestine was the land before that.
Palestine was the land before that, true. Not the nation, though. That was also established in the same UN resolution that created Israel.
So, from what you’re saying I understand that you’re the proponent of returning the entire area back to Iran? They’re the closest we can get to Persia, I think.
That would be your position, silly. You’re the one who supports removing the existing population and replacing it with another who claims historical ties.
On the contrary! I’m saying: leave it as it is, just give Palestinians a helping hand.
YOU are saying that the existing population (Israelis) needs to be purged in a genocide and the area returned to their historical owners.
Well, might be news to you, but Palestine as a nation exists since 1947, so the closest “historical owner” we have is Iran.
Why not.
Because both Palestinians and Israelis want their own nation?
European Jews can go back to the country they came from if they can’t help themselves from genocidal tendencies.
“European Jews” is like calling Palestinians “Iranians”. Makes exactly as much sense, mate.
Right, because, as we know, Israelis are a hive-mind and if one of them wants to commit genocide, then we know that ALL of them have genocidal tendencies.
Palestinians are Arabs.
Like I said: makes as much sense calling them Iranians as calling Israelis/Jews “Europeans”.