Your whole last argument is just one massive ad hominem and tu quoque trainwreck. Instead of actually addressing the policy, it immediately pivots to attacking people’s characters and calling them hypocrites just to deflect.
And the solution? Straight-up special pleading and geographic bias. Hiding behind tribalism to say “keep our costs low and jack theirs up to 35% because of their accents” isn’t an economic point—it’s just a double standard based on zero logic.
Yeah you are annoying so resorted to insults.
Your whole last argument is just one massive ad hominem and tu quoque trainwreck. Instead of actually addressing the policy, it immediately pivots to attacking people’s characters and calling them hypocrites just to deflect.
And the solution? Straight-up special pleading and geographic bias. Hiding behind tribalism to say “keep our costs low and jack theirs up to 35% because of their accents” isn’t an economic point—it’s just a double standard based on zero logic.
Murica