Nearly 55% of voters in Switzerland on Sunday rejected an initiative championed by the top right-wing party to cap the rich Alpine country’s population at 10 million, early results showed.

The populist Swiss People’s Party, which has the most seats in parliament, has stirred up and fostered anti-migration sentiment over the years, notably about an influx of workers from the neighboring European Union.

Some have dubbed the proposal a “Swiss Brexit” because it could jeopardize Switzerland’s deep ties to the European Union anchored by deals that foster economic growth, cultural ties and cross-border travel, among other things. Switzerland is not one of the EU’s 27 member states, but it is all but surrounded by four of them

  • vrek@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I know this isn’t how it would work but im just picturing some one woman giving birth, the doctor hands her the newborn and she holds it for the first time… Some man walks in wearing a black suit and pulls out a gun. He shoots the baby through the head. “sorry that was the 10 million and 1 Swiss child, we have a limit!”

      • vrek@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 minutes ago

        Yeah, I understood that. But a hard limit on population is crazy. You would need to have some way of killing people for each person born. That’s disregarding the fact that people have a beneficial use. They can help in food, service, manufacturing, business to business stuff.

        But taken to the extreme if some person in a suit just going around the country killing people for each person born…

        I don’t know how many hospitals are in Switzerland or how big they are but it’s definitely more than 10 a day so imagine someone just driving around all day yelling at traffic and any delay because they need to report how many people they killed that week and praying it’s not a busy week in the maternity ward…

    • arrow74@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Clearly it would be more humane to take out the oldest Swiss person instead of the youngest

      • deadcream@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 minutes ago

        Nah the nation-wide vote is the most moral approach. The list of candidates is selected from trending posts on social media, then the whole nation decides whom to kill in a democratic way.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Much better idea: kill the richest person and distribute their wealth evenly amongst the rest of the population, public infrastructure, and social programs

        Repeat until there’s no billionaires, no poverty, and nobody has to go without anything essential for living in a modern society.

      • vrek@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        That could be worse…watching tv on the couch with your spouse, you both laugh at the joke suddenly the door opens and your partners head splatters everywhere. The man in a black suit says “sorry, the tompsons just had a baby”…

        • arrow74@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Statistically it’s more common for the oldest person to be a widow(er)

          But if the Swiss population started to get out of control maybe