Tough situation. For one, ICC needs to react. On the other hand, ICC should know that allegations could be faked. ICC is not a brand and does not need to make shareholders happy. And one of the core principles in law is usually (except in the US): In dubio pro reo. In doubt, decide for the accused. And unless someone is convicted, they have to be treated as innocent.
Tough situation. For one, ICC needs to react. On the other hand, ICC should know that allegations could be faked. ICC is not a brand and does not need to make shareholders happy. And one of the core principles in law is usually (except in the US): In dubio pro reo. In doubt, decide for the accused. And unless someone is convicted, they have to be treated as innocent.
So I have mixed feelings about this.