• nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      at least the Hague and the UN and a third one that I actually haven’t heard of before. That’s what defines international law right?

      • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Pretending for a second that international law really exists, it is defined by international treaties. In this case, it would be UNCLOS.

        • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          yea UNCLOS and LOAC too it’s illegal as fuck according to all of those.

          if international law doesn’t exist and national law doesn’t exist and law doesn’t exist then why even talk about any of this? do I even exist? is money real? fuck, it’s like time is just numbers man

          • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            Who said national law doesn’t exist? You break national law, decent chance you end up in prison. That’s real enough, even if not perfect. But what happens when you break international law? 99% of the time, nothing. And in the rare cases something does happen, it’s usually not really because of the law. It’s because countries have incentives independent of the law that make them enforce it. Often, the enforcement being illegal as well. That’s not really law, that is a bunch of outlaws shouting at each other with pipes in their hands, threatning each other.