• Tuuktuuk@nord.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    That’s a rather standard thing in any country with compulsory military service. Typically you get that done with right when you’re 18-year-old and then you’re free to travel.

    In Finland it’s handled so that you cannot get a passport before you either finish your military service or have turned 30. That meant that when I wanted to travel with my brother outside the EU before they were 30, we were limited to countries such as Albania and Georgia that allow entry with just an ID card. (And also, had we wanted to destroy the climate by flying, we would have needed to fly the flight out from the Schengen area from some other country than Finland!)

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Which makes sense but Germany doesn’t have compulsory mil service. Yet. I guess this is a step in that direction.

      • geissi@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Germany suspended compulsory military service about two decades ago but the laws are still in the books.
        Now they want to increase troop count again, for now by hoping for more volunteers, but reinstating conscription is likely if the numbers don’t meet expectations.

        This law one isn’t actually new either but afaik it used to only apply during a “case of defense” (ie war) or a “case of tension”. As I understand, that prerequisite has been removed.

      • Tuuktuuk@nord.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        I think it does. At least I kept hearing “als ich mein Zivi gemacht hab” when I lived there. Most people elect to serve in the form of civil service instead, but civil service is a type of military service (as weird as that sounds).

        But maybe it’s very easy avoiding the whole thing altogether? I don’t know all that precisely, really. My “military service” was done in the form of civil service in a children daycare centre by the time I moved to Germany. And I’ve never been a German citizen anyhow.

        • Deckname@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Yes that was the case until 2010/11ish, when we got rid of compulsory military/civil service. I still had to do it after finishing high school in 2010, but it was sort of not enforced anymore. People born a few months after myself, didn’t have to do anything anymore.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          18 hours ago

          And that’s how it should be! It should be mandatory, and we should have it in the US too. Two years once you turn 18. Get people out of their local bubbles and show them what the world is like, make them useful citizens.

          • Tuuktuuk@nord.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            18 hours ago

            USA is only waging wars of aggression. It would be horrible forcing people to that shit, IMO.

            In Finland or Germany it’s very different because our armies exist strictly for self defence. When the US military should see military action, is decided in D.C.

            But when the Finnish military should see military is decided in Moscow.

            If your wars are something you fan decide about, it would be extremely immoral having compulsory military service.

            In countries that cannot decide when to not have a war, it’s immoral to not have compulsory military service, as that would mean only the poorest having to bear the brunt of the war.

            • rzadkie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              14 hours ago

              In Finland or Germany it’s very different because our armies exist strictly for self defence.

              How self defensive of them to occupy Afghanistan…

              • Tuuktuuk@nord.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                …and Iraq, true.

                Though, at least Finland sent the absolute minimum to both of those shitstorms, and that only after being blackmailed by USA. But zero conscripts were sent to either one. Especially the shit about Iraq is something I am really angry about.

          • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Weird how militarized nationalism still has any fans or supporters, but you do you I guess. I hope you’re glad your guy is in office.

    • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Passports are a violation of Human Rights, given how their purposes to be denied so that people cannot travel

      • Tuuktuuk@nord.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Well, the purpose is to be denied by the foreign country. Or, to be accepted by it, depending on your perspective.

        Typically your own country doesn’t (shouldn’t) care of shit about your passport, because according to the declaration of human rights, you are allowed to come and go to/from your country as you please. But other countries don’t have to give you that privilege.

        (I do think they should have to, though!)