• panthera_@lemmy.todayOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Under my plan Putin doesn’t get all he wants. He will be getting far less territory than he wants.

    • Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Except he’s not in it for territories.

      Also you got to remember all previous attempts to pacify an aggressor, starting from a nice chap by the name of Neville.

    • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Yeah but without compensation / reparations ? It’s absolutely a bad deal for the victims.

      • panthera_@lemmy.todayOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        You have to have a deal that Putin might accept. Putin will certainly reject a deal which requires reparations.

        • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I don’t think any one has to have a deal that they themselves cannot accept… why would the Zelensky dude and our fellow Ukrainians have to settle? They seem like a pretty brutal and opinionated bunch…

          No one « have to » until they are all eating dirt really.

          • panthera_@lemmy.todayOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Ukraine will accept my proposal because it would end a war which is killing its people and which it might not win. The problem is whether Putin will accept the proposal.