The United Nations General Assembly has voted to recognise the enslavement of Africans during the transatlantic slave trade as “the gravest crime against humanity”, a move advocates hope will pave the way for healing and justice.

The resolution - proposed by Ghana - called for this designation, while also urging UN member states to consider apologising for the slave trade and contributing to a reparations fund. It does not mention a specific amount of money.

The proposal was adopted with 123 votes in favour and three against - the United States, Israel and Argentina.

Countries like the UK have long rejected calls to pay reparations, saying today’s institutions cannot be held responsible for past wrongs.

  • Lydon_Feen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Next you’re gonna argue slavery only started in Africa when the first europeans started doing it, completely ignoring the centuries of arab slave trade before that, and centuries after europeans outlawed it, and which likely enslaved as many people.

    The truth is, it was an awful thing with a lot of different parties involved for different reasons, throughout a very long period.

      • Lydon_Feen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        How convenient you chose to ignore the exact paragraph from that link that touched very lightly on what I said:

        “In stark contrast, the trans-Saharan slave trade introduced chattel slavery where enslaved individuals were the property of their enslavers with no rights and their status was inherited by their offspring. This system stripped individuals of any agency and autonomy which reduced them to mere commodities.”

        Arabs enslaved millions for a much longer period of time (all the way up to the late 20th century), raped the women, neutered the men, literally denying milions of a future generation from existing.

        But I don’t see anyone asking them for compensations.

        • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          Strange you stopped reading there.

          Indigenous African slavery was typically localised whereas the trans-Atlantic slave trade functioned on a more industrial scale by forcibly transporting millions of Africans to the Americas to meet labour demands of plantation economies.

      • ceiphas@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        You means the egyptians didnt have institutionalized slaving? Really?

        • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Not in the same way. Even ancient Egypt considered slaves human and they had some rights, whereas trans-atlantic slavery fully reduced slaves to the level of animals. Egypt also didn’t start invasions primarily to capture slaves and use them on their plantations.

          While you’re technically correct, trans-atlantic slavery had countries literally running their economies on slaves which is what I meant.