Israel did not have a realistic plan for regime change when it attacked Iran, multiple Israeli security sources have said, with expectations that airstrikes could lead to a popular uprising having been driven by “wishful thinking” rather than hard intelligence.

Iran has survived nearly two weeks of bombing raids and the assassination of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and Trump is publicly contemplating ending the increasingly costly war.

If Iran’s new leadership keeps its grip on power, the long-term measure of the success of the conflict may hang on the fate of 440kg of enriched uranium which was buried under a mountain by US strikes last June, former and serving Israeli defence and intelligence sources said. Enough for more than 10 nuclear warheads, Iran could use it to hasten the construction of a weapon if the material remains in the country.

  • Gladaed@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    No. But you are just being accusatory and willfully misunderstanding my point.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I think it is wrong that Iran cracked down and probably killed tens of thousand of protestors.

      That does not make justification for a bombing.

      I am sure you are aware of several US and western sponsored regime changes in Iran leading to a backlash and the current conservatard leadership.

      I am having a hard time believing excusing this bombing and possible invasion as justified because Iran killed civilians.

      Considering we spent 20 years and trillions of dollars to take Afghanistan away from and then give it right back to the Taliban what do you think we are trying to accomplish in Iran!?

      You know who else just killed ten times this many people. Russia. Why are we going after the most powerful Muslim country in the world.

      I think we know why and it is disgusting.

      • ordinarycanuck@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I don’t think anyone here is celebrating bombing or war. Military action is always a terrible outcome.

        The concern many people have is what happens if nothing is done and WHEN Iran eventually acquires nuclear weapons. Once a regime that already sponsors militant groups and represses its own population has nuclear-capable warheads, the ability to prevent escalation becomes far more limited.

        At that point, the world isn’t choosing between diplomacy and intervention anymore, it’s choosing between living with a nuclear-armed regime like that or risking a much larger conflict later. That’s the dilemma people are talking about.

        • Gladaed@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          To be fair I saw a couple of cars honking and flying the Persian flag with the lion recently celebrating that the regime that displaced them from their ancestral home may be coming down and hoping for freedom.

          The nuclear threat of Iran also exists, but isn’t really relevant to my perception of the war.