• theyoyomaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    A safety exists to prevent human error. Not touching the trigger doesn’t solve this.

    The primary argument of “you might forget to disengage it in the heat of the moment” is complete bullshit. If you can’t reliably disengage a safety you can’t reliably not pull the trigger during a draw, shooting yourself in the femoral artery or hand. Either you practice your draw until it’s muscle memory or you don’t, removing safety features to simplify the process doesn’t make you safer.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The primary argument of “you might forget to disengage it in the heat of the moment” is complete bullshit.

      Even if you are in that (rather misguided) camp, there are better alternatives. Specifically, a grip safety. Safety automatically disengaged as long as you’re holding the gun properly. Can’t ‘forget’ to do that!

      And, yes, there are good, modern designs that use grip safeties. The Springfield XD line, for example. (Those models also require a trigger pull for disassembly, though. Is it that hard to include some kind of decocker?)

      • theyoyomaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m a fan of grip safeties but I still want some form of manual switch I can use to render the gun safe. I honestly think that the FN Five seveN is the best solution but standard 1911 thumb safety (or an HK version with decocker) does the job just fine.