• fizzle@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Maybe I’m misunderstanding something because no one here has mentioned the obvious:

    Did we acquire the full unredacted set of his emails ?

    • REDACTED@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 hours ago

      From what I remember, the guy said that not much was left and most of the emails were deleted

    • ubersolver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      80
      ·
      1 day ago

      Seriously, wouldn’t this be kind of huge news if we suddenly had access to the evidence they tried to hide? Too bad this is a news article and someone probably changed the password by now.

    • tetrachromacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      There’s no news on it and I have to assume it’s because if that is the full unredacted email there’s probably a ton of CSAM. If so it’s technically illegal to own and anyone who is downloading it might be opening themselves up to arrest or legal challenges, even if they’re a journalist.

      I would presume IF this is a full release of the Epstein GMail account, and IF it’s not a honeypot op of some kind from CIA/IDF/SVR/whoever, and IF it’s legit… then this is big. Nearly all American news orgs have been gutted though, and I doubt any billionaire that owns the news orgs would be ok with having their wealthy cohort exposed.

      Whoever might be investigating this would almost certainly keep quiet until all of their ducks are in a row because the second they publish, they’re going to be arrested for CSAM. Unless they’re in a country with no extradition treaty with the US. And even then they’ll be subject to extraordinary rendition cause Trump don’t care about US law, why would the lack of an extradition treaty stop him?

      • ubersolver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        It’s ridiculous that evidence of the crimes they committed is going to be used to arrest anyone who tries to uncover evidence of who committed those crimes. By ridiculous I don’t mean I don’t think it will happen. I think you are right about that.

        I mean, I know there are some people who would definitely do the wrong thing and that’s why it needed to be released carefully to avoid this kind of mess and why normally this kind of digging would be done by the government or trusted investigators, but it’s troublesome because the established power structure (regardless of party) are some of the same people who committed these crimes and we clearly can’t trust them to do the right thing.