When Sir Tim Berners-Lee invented the world wide web in 1989, his vision was clear: it would used by everyone, filled with everything and, crucially, it would be free.
Today, the British computer scientist’s creation is regularly used by 5.5 billion people – and bears little resemblance to the democratic force for humanity he intended.
In Australia to promote his book, This is for Everyone, Berners-Lee is reflecting on what his invention has become – and how he and a community of collaborators can put the power of the web back into the hands of its users.
Berners-Lee describes his excitement in the earliest years of the web as “uncontainable”. Approaching 40 years on, a rebellion is brewing among himself and a community of like-minded activists and developers.
“We can fix the internet … It’s not too late,” he writes, describing his mission as a “battle for the soul of the web”.
Berners-Lee traces the first corruption of the web to the commercialisation of the domain name system, which he believes would have served web users better had it been managed by a nonprofit in the public interest. Instead, he says, in the 1990s the .com space was pounced on by “charlatans”.
Let’s see yours.
I for one do not want like-minded individuals in any settings. I like diverse perspectives, unlikely thoughts, out of this quo activities, revolutionary ideas, xeno fora, etc. The weirder the better.
Does Tim praxis anything of the above?
I didn’t have a point. Your post made no sense to me!
Do you think the people who build the web should be like-minded with you about diversity? I think everybody in this thread agrees that the web should work with screen readers; do you think other opinions are valid?
Did it make sense later?
No. But if this is the case, then the consequences is what we are living with right now.
Always. I am just laughing my opinion required to be censored 🧵, which proved my point.
Dude…
He could have patented what he made. He choose to put the good of everyone over himself. He has some pretty radical ideas about information being accessible and free.
He is saying the classist fucks as you call them took the domain system and privatized it for profit and control.
If anything he is saying let the diversity of opinion and thought matter, let the power to publish be in the hands of everyone.
For his clique. Are the blind part of it? Are the slaves part it, are the illiterate part of it? He most certainty wasn’t the innovator of free press. But he sure didn’t keep accessible to the silenced.
Who do you THINK WAS PART OF THAT PROCESS‽ The disabled, the poor, and the oppressed‽ What strange minded individuals would even conceptualize the hierarchical administration of addressing‽
And how do you achieve this? In the jungle, in a zoo, in a computer lab with academically groomed scientists? Please explain how you actually diversify opinions, provoke thoughts, and arm people the powers to publish freely. Do I have to bring my clean room uniform too⸮
Your link was about ICANN and DNS. This is one of the problems he is complaining about, as it’s corporate and not in the hands of the public.
Also something Berners Lee had nothing to do with, that was invented earlier.
And I said that here in my last response to you.
Maybe you should ask some questions, nicely, instead of going off like a raving lunatic when you don’t know what you are talking about.
Who is ICANN comprised off?🙃
Are you just stupid? You called a person names and then had a rant because they don’t like who ICANN is comprised of.
What the hell, how dumb are you?
now you have to show me how you guys edit your posts without the edit symbol.
2nd I’ve seen this behavior, I thought it was moderator abuse.
Are you asking this as yourself, or you finally see which like-minded activists succeeded his ethos?
I just think you are an idiot. You keep kind of proving that…
Is this based on ICANN’s assessment, DSM-5, or your classism?