• GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    If America and Israel were supporting protests in hell, I would have no choice but to support the devil

    • Mrkawfee@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      They have killed so many innocent people it boils my blood that they suddenly feign an interest in the “poor protestors” to manufacture consent for criminal air strikes and regime decapitation.

      And of course liberals are there to pearl clutch about human rights and run cover for neocons as always.

      • GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I don’t know how so many people are still falling for this. Sure, the Iranian government isn’t exactly “good”, but they’re the only major counterbalance to the genocidal Nazi imperialists that’s left in the region.

        • Mrkawfee@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 minutes ago

          True. It is really something that Saudi Arabia is now getting closer to Iran when for the last decade they’ve been making overturns to get into bed with the Zionists.

          Everyone in the region knows that if Iran falls then no one is safe from israel deciding one day that you have to die.

  • hoch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Oh neat, the source in the article is a Russian state-owned news agency.

    Your propaganda is not welcome here.

    • Mrkawfee@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Yeah its better to stick with CBS and other psyops “news” softening Americans up for regime change.

      Edit: How many people will you terrorists kill on behalf of your masters in that satanic Zionist colony.

      • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Russian news are untrustable, unlike US owned news outlets which have never once shown bias or deception on the topic of Israel. /s

        • Mrkawfee@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 minutes ago

          US liberal media is not afraid to tell the truth that Amerikka is a benevolent superpower that only cares about freeing people from tyranny.

  • perestroika@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Let’s pause for a while and think about who controls the dissection of bodies, and who can tell coroners to sign statements in Iran.

    Yeah, the Iranian government which just supressed the protests. And desperately needs a scapegoat.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      True for sure. Also the source is TASS. On the other hand it’s also true that Israel has interest in toppling the Iranian regime. It’s a well established fact that Israel 's Mossad operates within Iran and funnelling weapons furthers that interest. I don’t doubt Israel has done whatever they could to help the protest topple the regime, and I also don’t doubt the Iranian regime did what they could to pin this on Israel and other foreign actors to deflect responsibility.

              • 3abas@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                14 hours ago

                How would taking credit for shooting Iranian children/supplying weapons to shoot Iranian children escalate violence against Iranians?

                They want the narrative to be that the “Iranian regime” is shooting peaceful protestors, and for the US to bomb Iran…

                • RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  Mosad like ISIS take credit for everything, because it induces a paranoia in their enemies.

                  Pretending nobody in Iran has agency except Mosad agencies is just helping Mosad, great job.

    • DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I know this has nothing to do with it, just trying to gauge your honesty. What is the Hannibal Directive?

  • carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The chain of custody for this reporting is so rank it stinks to heaven. It seems to go IRG to TASS. The Iranian government is anything but leftist. It is not your friend.

  • chillhelm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    So the Iranian Regime claims the children shot during the riots were shot by Israelis?

    GTFO with these fake ass fake news.

  • Sculptus Poe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Israel sold weapons to Iran when Iran wasn’t their enemy and Iraq was the main danger. They would have no advantage at all in squashing the uprising there. This whole article is misdirection and misleading, playing into the hands of Iran’s despots. (Reading the article closely, which is a difficult task considering the horrible website, Iranian despots are claiming that Israel gave ammo and guns to the ones trying to revolt. That does make more sense, but the way the article is written, you can tell the whole article is propaganda for Iranian despots, because they spin it as a bad thing to help the uprising and use that kid caught in the crossfire as rage bait. )

  • RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Israeli military-grade ammunition embedded

    Lol, lmao even, as opposed to civilian-grade ammunition.

    Might as well describe Lemmy as a ring of gurlerilla servers using military grade encryption run on servers with links to Israel (e.g there’s at least 1 kernel developer in Israel).

    • Mrkawfee@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Yeah just stick with trustworthy sources on Iran like the New York Times

      • AmidFuror@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Everyone is equally untrustworthy. All politicians lie, so Trump is really just like everyone else. North Korea and the US both violate civil rights, so they’re equivalent.

  • flandish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    how does one look at a fired round, presumably beat to shit from impact, and trace it back to a origin? unless this is people assuming the entire round fires and have no understanding?

      • carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        5 seconds of reading and critical thinking would dismiss what you linked. The posted article is for linking bullets to found guns. They didn’t seem to find the guns. Just the bullets.

        Also like much of forensics, forensic tool mark and bullet mark analysis is crock full of shit. Like much forensics, attempts to ground it in robust reproducable controlled science and statistical work has fared poorly. I would not rely on it for this or really anything.

      • RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Are you AI?

        Because it took you 5s to find an incorrect answer and confidently link to a Wikipedia article, that doesn’t answer the question.

      • ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        And it doesn’t answer the question. Examination of the bullet can tell you something about what kind of gun barrel it was fired from. It cannot tell you that the ammunition itself is “Israeli military grade” unless Israel is doing something unusual with the composition of their bullets. As that page says (under the Criticisms section), comparative bullet lead analysis is not necessarily a reliable indicator of where the bullet was manufactured.

        I sort of think that staring at bullet striations is basically tea leaf reading, but even if you think it’s perfectly reliable, without a suspect weapon to compare to it can only tell you what kinds of gun barrels could have fired the shot.

          • ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Well, this is what the linked article says about it:

            Prior to September 2005, comparative bullet-lead analysis was performed on bullets found at a scene that were too destroyed for striation comparison. The technique would attempt to determine the unique elemental breakdown of the bullet and compare it to seized bullets possessed by a suspect.[47] Review of the method found that the breakdown of elements found in bullets could be significantly different enough to potentially allow for two bullets from separate sources to be correlated to each other. However, there are not enough differences to definitely match a bullet from a crime scene to one taken from a suspect’s possession.[48] An additional report in 2004 from the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) found that the testimony given regarding comparative bullet-lead analysis was overstated and potentially “misleading under the federal rules of evidence”.[47] In 2005, the Federal Bureau of Investigation indicated that they would no longer be performing comparative bullet-lead analysis.[49]