Toyota, Progressive Insurance, and a data analytics firm are now being accused of collecting detailed personal driving information without proper consent

  • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 hours ago

    What amazes me is how many people not only willingly giving up their privacy without any understand of what it means to do so or the implications of it, but also so many have a defense of ‘if you are in public you have no right or expectation of privacy at all’.

    This is bullshit. While you have a reduced expectation of privacy by virtue of being in public, the fact that your movements are alp documented so completely either by private or public entities without warrants, your face and expressions and dress scanned, and even videos you watch on your phone based on some flock cameras I have seen is an outrage.

    People have a right to sometimes just go out and disappear for a while. I used to do it all the damn as a teenager and very young adult. I didnt run away from home or skip school, but I needed genuine alone time to think and let my mind and body feel free for a moment and give myself a minor mental reset. This is impossible if I am on camera all the damn time. The last thing I want is to take a walk through some artsy parts of town or a park and then get ads on ‘want to escape? Here are some nice vacation spots to go to’, or get ads on shit just because I did some window shopping or in-store browsing.

    And then there is this shit. How all that spying affects you financially and maybe even professionally as AI now is reviewing CVs and you better damn well believe that they will be integrating all information on you if you apply anywhere.

    And for the ‘this prevents crime’ shit no it does not. Crime resolution rates have been dropping throughout even the wealthiest most surveillance heavy countries. A study from around 20 years ago in the UK showed thay the places with the most cameras don’t have less crime or more solved crimes than those with less cameras. More funding for police and more police tools have ironically lead to a massive reduction in murder rate resolution in the US and elsewhere. Which is surprising snd terrifying… because just how many innocent people have been put in prison in the past without anyone knowing?

    It is entirely about social control. Have you ever wondered why protests seem to be less effective and there aren’t that many revolutions or successful coups as there were last century? That is why. (And yes I am aware they still happen, but they are much harder to pull off)

    • OshagHennessey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The best example I’ve heard is, if I wait outside your house and follow you around everywhere you go, every single time you leave the house, even though you’re “in public,” that’s still a crime and it’s called “stalking.”

      • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Even searching for someone obsessively online and being a little TOO interested in them online is cyberstalking.

        The line there is different than in off-line settings, but it does exist. Someone who is a fan of an entertainer and likes all of their online posts is one thing, but a person who has plans that involve harassment is something else.

      • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Precisely right. We should press charges against all the big tech companies for stalking us.