Hamas has called on Israel to allow an impartial international investigation into its attack on 7 October 2023 and has rejected that it killed civilians or committed atrocities.

“The resistance did not target any hospital, school, or house of worship; it did not kill a single journalist or any member of ambulance crews. We challenge [Israel] to prove otherwise,” it said.

In the new document, Hamas said that “Western media and Zionist lobby groups” had launched a disinformation campaign about the events of the attack.

“The Israeli entity promoted a series of lies and fallacies about killing children and raping women, paving the way to proceed with an all-out genocide project that was pre-planned and aimed to erase Gaza from existence,” it said.

  • phar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    The article you posted isn’t related to what he said. Can you explain what you disagree with? Just trying to understand the conversation, not siding one way or another.

    • Barbecue Cowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s probably not a real commenter.

      You’ll find a trend on any controversial topic of posters who just post the first link they find and I think the assumption is that people won’t read it. They’re relying on people who agree in general to just go along with the upvote train, it usually works out for them.

      • blackris@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        This is wild. But I can see how that works. Thx for the info. Inwas wondering, what they were about with that link.

        • doben@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 hours ago

          The article showcases the hypocrisy in demanding the oppressed people to behave more human than the barbaric oppressor is actually behaving towards them. Argueing that this user might not be a real account, just because you (or the other user, whatever) are unable to comprehend the critique is lazy and dishonest.

          • blackris@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            No. Who does the evil things, I talked about above, is an evil piece of shit and does not earn any support or approval. Doesn’t matter, what fucking reasons or ideology they have. To act like this never has lead to anything and it was never a strategy to win anything. Those deeds are just pure hate and are absolutely condemnable.

            • doben@lemmy.wtf
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Nobody approved of atrocities. But you demanded an oppressed people to resist in a specific way, that you personally see as morally just. But you have no idea about the lived reality on the ground. It would have been stronger to focus your condemning language towards the oppressor, that did and still every day is doing the same and uncountable worse and more atrocities. But you didn’t do that. You actually never did that.

              You only ever reacted towards comments that did display Hamas in the slightest positive way. You never ever reacted on comments that did display Israel or the IDF in the slightest positive way, although they are the genociding settler-colonial actor here.

              So either you are just reacting on conditioned indoctrination or are a chauvinist1 or are maybe even just a racist. Which is it?


              1: Unwarranted bias, favoritism, or devotion to one’s own particular group, cause, or idea.