• Caveman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I get where you’re going with this but it’s not that dumb IMO, the maximum penalty absolutely is dumb.

    If a person can barely cycle and obviously is drunk on a bike I think it’s fair to assume that they’re a danger to others so it should be illegal but the police shouldn’t be breathalysing everyone.

    With tweaks to the law I think it’s fine:

    1. Allow 0.3 instead of 0.15 so you can have two drinks and ride a bike. Bikes go a lot slower so the reaction time requirement is not the same.

    2. Removing driving license for a non-traffic violation doesn’t make sense, it disproportionately affects those that have licenses.

    3. The fine and jailtime is ludicrous. Add in recklessly riding a bike for those such as riding too fast past pedestrians and jailtime for seriously injuring someone like breaking their leg or something.

    Generally you want people to ride a bike instead of driving a car when drinking, it’s a lot safer for everyone but still discourage it enough so people consider taking public transportation. If people walk their bike through crowds and then ride along empty streets just let them.

    Bottom line, it’s a good idea, but horrible execution.