The references to AI sound more like PR. They are simply going to can positions (and make their product/services worse) and force others to work overtime.
I am willing to bet AI is involved in this firing session in a very superficial manner.
I’m interested, in a fascinated and horrified way, how HP could possibly make their products and services worse. I’m sure they’ll find a way, and I’m sure it’ll be so terrible that none of us will be able to look away. But at the moment I’ll be damned if I can think of how.
It probably gets to pick names from the pre generated spreadsheet of people they don’t give a shit about (which is say all the staff who don’t interact with the C suite).
I don’t mean to be that guy, but that’s the only manner AI could possibly be involved, and the reason I point this out is that it’s not just for the scenario, it’s every one of them. It’s a very often wrong text predictor/referencer at most.
The references to AI sound more like PR. They are simply going to can positions (and make their product/services worse) and force others to work overtime.
I am willing to bet AI is involved in this firing session in a very superficial manner.
I’m interested, in a fascinated and horrified way, how HP could possibly make their products and services worse. I’m sure they’ll find a way, and I’m sure it’ll be so terrible that none of us will be able to look away. But at the moment I’ll be damned if I can think of how.
It probably gets to pick names from the pre generated spreadsheet of people they don’t give a shit about (which is say all the staff who don’t interact with the C suite).
I don’t mean to be that guy, but that’s the only manner AI could possibly be involved, and the reason I point this out is that it’s not just for the scenario, it’s every one of them. It’s a very often wrong text predictor/referencer at most.