Italy’s parliament on Tuesday approved a law that introduces femicide into the country’s criminal law and punishes it with life in prison.

The vote coincided with the international day for the elimination of violence against women, a day designated by the U.N. General Assembly.

The law won bipartisan support from the center-right majority and the center-left opposition in the final vote in the Lower Chamber, passing with 237 votes in favor.

The law, backed by the conservative government of Premier Giorgia Meloni, comes in response to a series of killings and other violence targeting women in Italy. It includes stronger measures against gender-based crimes including stalking and revenge porn.

  • falseWhite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It take a certain type of flaw in logic to assume that because a group is “getting” something, it means another group is losing something.

    What if one group is getting something unproportionally more than the other.

    That creates inequality, essentially meaning that the disadvantaged group is losing something. I.e. they get less that the other group.

    So yeah, if you give one group much more than the other, they are losing something.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Recognizing group harassment is also benefitting individualism by recognizing that… inequity is real.

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      So are you guys getting less stalking, harassmentd, domestic violence and murder by your partner or are you just blowing smoke rings here

      • falseWhite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        We’re no longer discussing stalking or harassment.

        We are talking about equality between different groups and what it means.

        They’re trying to use “logic” to justify giving one group more than the other.

        And I’m using the same “logic” to argue the opposite.

        Simple debate, nothing more.

        • Taleya@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Your “logic” is no such thing. And stop pretending your scenarios exist isolate of context. Damned fool.

          • falseWhite@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            You know you won the argument when the other party starts insulting instead of presenting valid arguments.

            Keep your options to yourself in serious debates please. It just muddles the truth.