• _stranger_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I would support having links to “the controversy” on that page, except those “controversy” pages are going to be filled with lies, which don’t belong on Wikipedia. Maybe a page of links to not-wikipedia sources so that people can easily judge the info by its source? You know who would be a good group to make this call? The Wikipedia editors

    The Wikipedia editors know what they’re doing, I trust them more than a guy who said things under pressure in a rigged interview, even if he is the founder.