I would support having links to “the controversy” on that page, except those “controversy” pages are going to be filled with lies, which don’t belong on Wikipedia. Maybe a page of links to not-wikipedia sources so that people can easily judge the info by its source? You know who would be a good group to make this call? The Wikipedia editors
The Wikipedia editors know what they’re doing, I trust them more than a guy who said things under pressure in a rigged interview, even if he is the founder.
I would support having links to “the controversy” on that page, except those “controversy” pages are going to be filled with lies, which don’t belong on Wikipedia. Maybe a page of links to not-wikipedia sources so that people can easily judge the info by its source? You know who would be a good group to make this call? The Wikipedia editors
The Wikipedia editors know what they’re doing, I trust them more than a guy who said things under pressure in a rigged interview, even if he is the founder.