• Gsus4@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    Maybe they could remove it from Obama (for not doing anything to earn it, before or after) so the annoying orange will finally be happy and do something for the allies for once.

    • Ech@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Appeasing narcissists doesn’t make them suddenly care about others. If anything, it reinforces their behavior.

      • Gsus4@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Let me repeat: the prize should never have been given to Obama in first place, this is just doing the right thing anyway, not because he asked. And remove Kissinger’s and Aung San Suu Kyi too.

          • Gsus4@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Getting Arafat, Rabin and Peres to agree on something was well worth the prize…but I agree that starting to remove them would be opening a can of worms. It was just an attempt to reclaim some legitimacy for the prize, particularly if you work against the award after getting it.

    • D_C@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      They could take it away from Obama and then give two prizes to the obese narcissistic cunt and he still wouldn’t do anything for anybody.
      Not unless you bribe him with a gold trinket, or something shiny. The useless paedophilic orange piece of shit is basically a mentally incompetent magpie.