As in, doesn’t matter at all to you.

  • Soapbox@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Y’all”

    I will die on the hill that it’s more efficient and neutral than the alternatives.

    • runner_g@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 minutes ago

      “Y’all” and the plural “all y’all” are part of my daily vocabulary. And I’m in no way of southern origin.

    • deathbird@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      First we’re all like “Thou is too casual, gotta use the plural second person instead.” Then oh no, turns out number in pronouns is actually useful sometimes, but thou sounds old fashioned now, so we just gotta re-pluralize the second person. And then you get y’all.

      I like y’all, but I almost wish we could just bring thou back.

    • Pulptastic@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I recently realized that w’all needs to be shakespeared too. Following the pattern of other languages, y’all and w’all are missing in English.

      Also, I shakespeared the verb shakespeared, in reference to Shakespeare making up new words by following patterns among other words.

      • Soapbox@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I won’t argue against w’all. I’m fine with it in principle. But it’s not something I think I’ve ever said, or ever heard anyone say.