overload@sopuli.xyz to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · edit-22 days agoWe all know grammar Nazis. What incorrect grammar are you completely in defence of?message-squaremessage-square138fedilinkarrow-up150arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up144arrow-down1message-squareWe all know grammar Nazis. What incorrect grammar are you completely in defence of?overload@sopuli.xyz to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · edit-22 days agomessage-square138fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareoverload@sopuli.xyzOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up23·edit-22 days agoI think if I took it too far and said that all contractions are basically acceptable, y’all’d’n’t’ve agreed with me.
minus-squareForester@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·edit-22 days agoYou all did not have
minus-squarekryptonite@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·2 days agoIt would be “You all would not have” because “You all did not have agreed with me” doesn’t make sense.
minus-squareℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoAnd I understood it perfectly the first time, which makes it acceptable by my lights.
minus-squareTʜᴇʀᴀᴘʏGⒶʀʏ⁽ᵗʰᵉʸ‘ᵗʰᵉᵐ⁾@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 day agoI use this one unironically lol
minus-squareBluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 days agoI’d’n’t’ve had a single issue with it. In fact, I quite enjoy multi-contractions
I think if I took it too far and said that all contractions are basically acceptable, y’all’d’n’t’ve agreed with me.
This looks aggressively welsh.
You all did not have
It would be “You all would not have” because “You all did not have agreed with me” doesn’t make sense.
And I understood it perfectly the first time, which makes it acceptable by my lights.
I use this one unironically lol
I’d’n’t’ve had a single issue with it. In fact, I quite enjoy multi-contractions