• P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 days ago

    And I’ve concluded that we’re well past that point, and approaching the point at which we need to reconsider what, exactly, the internet really is, and that is to say that it should not be considered a source of any sort of authentic experience.

    It never was an “authentic experience”. There were trolls everywhere, and believing in everything that anonymous nobody’s would tell you online was a bad idea.

    Now? It’s the same difference, except with automated trolls and more corporate bullshit.

    • djsoren19@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’d add another difference: way more idiots. Back in the day, that idea that everything on the internet needed to be taken with a grain of salt was incredibly widespread. It was one of the bedrocks of internet culture, and it’d get memed to death.

      Now, the number of people who view everything on the internet as gospel truth has surpassed the number of healthy skeptics.

      • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I think the skeptics have always remained at a constant level. It’s just that echo chambers and the siloing of communities have skewed people’s perceptions of those levels.

    • coronach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      The volume - weaponization levels of spew - makes a difference between an average Joe gullibly “charging” their phone in a microwave to the future of nations and their public being undermined.