• blazera@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Right, that includes Trump. Its been a democrat funding and supporting this genocide the entire time. You hypocrites cant use these deaths to fuckin support democrats.

          • skye@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            because Donald “I will let Netyanahu finish the job” Trump is somehow better for this. Get your head out of your ass lol

            • blazera@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Take a minute to read that headline again. You got Trump for this now, because you insisted to everyone to accept that headline, those deaths, that ‘better than this’ just isnt an option. You wouldnt permit people that care about life, that oppose genocide somewhere else to go. So they went nowhere, because genocide is not an option.

              • krashmo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                And yet accelerated genocide is the option that was chosen.

                Look, I get the argument you’re making. The problem is that it hinges entirely on accepting a premise that isn’t based in reality. Progress, specifically as it relates to harm reduction, doesn’t happen instantaneously. It never has. You take the wins you can get and then push for the next step. You can be mad about that, and I would argue that we all should be, but it’s not going to change the way things work. In this case you’ve let idealism get in the way of actual tangible improvement. Even if you disagree with that characterization you can’t dispute the fact that you’ve at least helped shut the door on the potential for improvement. If you can find a way to rationalize that in your head to make you feel like the good guy then I understand why you would want to take that path, but do you honestly believe the people of Gaza take solace in the fact that you had good intentions? I’d wager they don’t give a shit how you frame this in your mind. They’re just thinking about what a Trump presidency means for the future of this conflict and that isn’t good by any stretch of the imagination.

                • blazera@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  This is deranged. Progress? Improvement? What did Kamala say she would do differently? Did she say she’d stop sending weapons and financial assistance?